2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11001-010-9101-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preference of echo features for classification of seafloor sediments using neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, a first-order correction was applied to remove the influence of the depth on the time spread. The time spread of the echo envelope was multiplied by a factor h ref /h, where h ref is a reference depth of 50 m (approximate average of all the spot depths) and h is the depth at the position of the individual echo data (De and Chakraborty, 2010). The procedure followed is equivalent to the depthdependent correction described by van Walree et al (2005).…”
Section: Depth-dependent Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, a first-order correction was applied to remove the influence of the depth on the time spread. The time spread of the echo envelope was multiplied by a factor h ref /h, where h ref is a reference depth of 50 m (approximate average of all the spot depths) and h is the depth at the position of the individual echo data (De and Chakraborty, 2010). The procedure followed is equivalent to the depthdependent correction described by van Walree et al (2005).…”
Section: Depth-dependent Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their recent research, De and Chakraborty (2010, 2011, 2012 discussed the estimation of mean grain sizes of mixed seabed sediments using dual-frequency single beam data and neural network, but they did not use multi-beam echo sounder BS data to do seabed mixed sediment classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%