2015
DOI: 10.1080/21711976.2015.1026082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preference for trees, optimism and physical, psychological and social wellbeing among high school students / Preferencia hacia el árbol, optimismo y bienestar físico, psicológico y social en estudiantes

Abstract: A study was performed examining the influence of preference for trees on self-reported levels of physical, psychological and social wellbeing, mediated by optimism, among 323 students in their final years of high school. Findings indicated that the greater the preference for trees, the greater the individual's optimism, which in turn influenced physical, psychological and social wellbeing. These findings could be important because they pertain to teenagers in school education, residing in a metropolitan area w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The following instruments were used in order to assess the different variables included in psychological health: (a) Psychological Wellbeing Questionnaire (PWBQ) [41], composed of 10 items with Likert scale from 1 (never) to 4 (always) and scores obtained by summing the individual answers, which can range from 10 to 40. In our sample, the structure of the questionnaire showed good validity (χ 2 /gl = 1.802; NFI = 0.953; CFI = 0.967; RMSEA = 0.045).…”
Section: Psychological Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following instruments were used in order to assess the different variables included in psychological health: (a) Psychological Wellbeing Questionnaire (PWBQ) [41], composed of 10 items with Likert scale from 1 (never) to 4 (always) and scores obtained by summing the individual answers, which can range from 10 to 40. In our sample, the structure of the questionnaire showed good validity (χ 2 /gl = 1.802; NFI = 0.953; CFI = 0.967; RMSEA = 0.045).…”
Section: Psychological Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wellbeing is defined as a person's subjective perception of their quality of life, and is related to individuals' degree of satisfaction and happiness with their life, where positive states of mind prevail in all spheres of life, including both their mental and their physical health (Denegri et al, 2015). Wellbeing, as explored in this study, involves three dimensions: the physical, the psychological (both cognitive and emotional), and the social (C. García et al, 2017;cf. Alfaro et al, 2015).…”
Section: Wellbeing and Children's Experiences In Natural Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such Mediterranean ecosystems occur only along the surroundings of the Mediterranean Sea, west of Australia, California, and South Africa (Veblen et al, 2015). The Reserve is rich in flora and fauna, including some representative species of the Chilean flora, such as hualos (Nothofagus glauca), raulies (Nothofagus alpina), and macrofauna, such as burrowing tricahue parrots (Cyanoliseus patagonus), Chilean black woodpeckers (Campephilus magellanicus), condors (Vultur gryphus), and pumas (Puma concolor) among others (de la Barrera et al, 2011;Fuentes Lásmar, 2010;C. García et al, 2017).…”
Section: Study Site: Altos De Lircay National Reserve (Alnr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale was used because it is currently the most utilized optimism scale (Huffman et al, 2019). Although there is a lack of consensus about the factorial structure of the LOT-R (Carver et al, 2010), this study adopted the recommendation of Cano- Garcia et al (2015) to apply the one-dimensionality approach to the scale with a score resulting from adding the six items, thereby reflecting dispositional optimism.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the Cronbach's alpha was .76. (Garcia et al, 2015;see Appendix 4). This scale consists of four items with four response options (4 ¼Yes, 3 ¼ Possibly Yes, 2 ¼ Possibly No and 1 ¼ No).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%