2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-004-0249-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preference for spatial cues in a non-storing songbird species

Abstract: Male mammals typically outperform their conspecific females on spatial tasks. A sex difference in cues used to solve the task could underlie this performance difference as spatial ability is reliant on appropriate cue use. Although comparative studies of memory in food-storing and non-storing birds have examined species differences in cue preference, few studies have investigated differences in cue use within a species. In this study, we used a one-trial associative food-finding task to test for sex difference… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A sketch of the feeding tray is also included, see details in the text. Red squares denote the red felt flaps covering holes in the feeding tray test day (as in Hodgson and Healy 2005). These measures of learning were used because there was a high degree of variability in learning performance, since some birds never learnt to use the tray.…”
Section: Learning and Spatial Memory Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A sketch of the feeding tray is also included, see details in the text. Red squares denote the red felt flaps covering holes in the feeding tray test day (as in Hodgson and Healy 2005). These measures of learning were used because there was a high degree of variability in learning performance, since some birds never learnt to use the tray.…”
Section: Learning and Spatial Memory Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of early-life exposure to Pb on learning and spatial memory was tested following slightly modified protocols from Hodgson and Healy (2005) and Arnold et al (2007) where a food tray was used. Only spatial cues (location of the reward) were tested.…”
Section: Learning and Spatial Memory Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation for this difference is that spatial cues in a changing environment may generally be more reliable over longer time periods compared with local cues. Storers need to relocate caches over long periods and may therefore be under a particular selection pressure (Clayton and Krebs, 1994;Brodbeck, 1994;Herz et al, 1994;Brodbeck and Shettleworth, 1995) (but see Hodgson and Healy, 2005;LaDage et al, 2009;Feenders and Smulders, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree to which a given species is reliant on a cue is probably driven by its particular salience in the immediate environment, the quality of its informational content, and its utility to the species in question (Hodgson and Healy, 2005). In contrast, the geometric cues do not seem to be context-dependent (reviewed in Tommasi et al, 2012), and their use, until recently (i.e., Hurly et al, 2014), has only been investigated in the laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%