Preexposure Prophylaxis to Prevent Acquisition of HIV
Michael J. Barry,
Wanda K. Nicholson,
Michael Silverstein
et al.
Abstract:ImportanceAn estimated 1.2 million persons in the US currently have HIV, and more than 760 000 persons have died of complications related to HIV since the first cases were reported in 1981. Although treatable, HIV is not curable and has significant health consequences. Therefore, effective strategies to prevent HIV are an important public health and clinical priority.ObjectiveThe US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of preexposure prophy… Show more
“…Medical providers have noted in prior research that patient characteristics and providers’ perceptions of patients play a part in their intention to prescribe and in their actual prescribing of PrEP to adolescents 12 – 15 , 17 , 18 . Fourth, our study only analyzed prior prescription of PrEP and not other USPSTF recommendations regarding PrEP identification, discussion, and care, such as taking an HIV risk assessment to identify adolescents at risk of contracting HIV, educating adolescent patients and their parents about PrEP, or discussing the risks and benefits of the different PrEP medications and modalities (e.g., Truvada® v. Descovy® v. Apretude®; daily oral v. long-acting injectable) 4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2019, adolescents and young adults (13–24 years old) accounted for one-fifth of new HIV infections in the United States (US) 1 . The Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) 2 initiative, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 3 , and the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 4 recommend primary care providers (PCPs) prescribe HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to patients at risk for contracting HIV and who meet PrEP eligibility requirements, including adolescents. Although adolescents and young adults are at risk of contracting HIV, adolescents and young adults have the greatest unmet need for PrEP among all other age groups 5 – 9 .…”
Although HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively and safely prevents HIV among adolescents, uptake of PrEP is low. Adolescents must have primary care providers (PCPs) prescribe them PrEP, making PCPs critical actors in PrEP delivery. However, research has primarily investigated determinants of PCPs’ intention to prescribe adolescents PrEP rather than the determinants of performing the behavior itself. We examined the demographic, clinical practice, and implementation determinants of PCPs previously prescribing PrEP to adolescents. PCPs were recruited from a national Qualtrics panel of licensed medical providers in the United States from July 15-August 19, 2022. The Theoretical Domains Framework informed the implementation determinants measured. A multivariable logistic regression was used. PCPs who were more knowledgeable of the CDC guidelines (aOR 2.97, 95% CI 2.16–4.10), who were assigned male at birth (aOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03–2.59), and who practiced in the Western region (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.04–3.30) had greater odds of prior prescribing adolescents PrEP. Provider-based educational interventions should be designed, implemented, and tested to encourage PCPs to prescribe PrEP to eligible adolescents.
“…Medical providers have noted in prior research that patient characteristics and providers’ perceptions of patients play a part in their intention to prescribe and in their actual prescribing of PrEP to adolescents 12 – 15 , 17 , 18 . Fourth, our study only analyzed prior prescription of PrEP and not other USPSTF recommendations regarding PrEP identification, discussion, and care, such as taking an HIV risk assessment to identify adolescents at risk of contracting HIV, educating adolescent patients and their parents about PrEP, or discussing the risks and benefits of the different PrEP medications and modalities (e.g., Truvada® v. Descovy® v. Apretude®; daily oral v. long-acting injectable) 4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2019, adolescents and young adults (13–24 years old) accounted for one-fifth of new HIV infections in the United States (US) 1 . The Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) 2 initiative, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 3 , and the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 4 recommend primary care providers (PCPs) prescribe HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to patients at risk for contracting HIV and who meet PrEP eligibility requirements, including adolescents. Although adolescents and young adults are at risk of contracting HIV, adolescents and young adults have the greatest unmet need for PrEP among all other age groups 5 – 9 .…”
Although HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively and safely prevents HIV among adolescents, uptake of PrEP is low. Adolescents must have primary care providers (PCPs) prescribe them PrEP, making PCPs critical actors in PrEP delivery. However, research has primarily investigated determinants of PCPs’ intention to prescribe adolescents PrEP rather than the determinants of performing the behavior itself. We examined the demographic, clinical practice, and implementation determinants of PCPs previously prescribing PrEP to adolescents. PCPs were recruited from a national Qualtrics panel of licensed medical providers in the United States from July 15-August 19, 2022. The Theoretical Domains Framework informed the implementation determinants measured. A multivariable logistic regression was used. PCPs who were more knowledgeable of the CDC guidelines (aOR 2.97, 95% CI 2.16–4.10), who were assigned male at birth (aOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03–2.59), and who practiced in the Western region (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.04–3.30) had greater odds of prior prescribing adolescents PrEP. Provider-based educational interventions should be designed, implemented, and tested to encourage PCPs to prescribe PrEP to eligible adolescents.
“…However, the degree of effectiveness varied based on the level of adherence (less effective when not taken as prescribed) and was founded on its use in combination with safer sex practices 8 . Being that PrEP only protects against HIV, it is critical not to obfuscate the message that condom use remains important and proven for protection against other STIs and that barrier protective measures are also vital in helping prevent HIV if PrEP is not taken as prescribed 9 . Two additional agents, emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (Descovy) and the long-acting injectable integrase inhibitor drug, cabotegravir (Apretude), each indicated for specific populations, have since also been approved for PrEP 9 .…”
Section: Getting To Zeromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being that PrEP only protects against HIV, it is critical not to obfuscate the message that condom use remains important and proven for protection against other STIs and that barrier protective measures are also vital in helping prevent HIV if PrEP is not taken as prescribed 9 . Two additional agents, emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (Descovy) and the long-acting injectable integrase inhibitor drug, cabotegravir (Apretude), each indicated for specific populations, have since also been approved for PrEP 9 . In those who are compliant, PrEP has been found to diminish the risk of contracting HIV from sexual activity by approximately 99% and from injection drug use by at least 74%.…”
Section: Getting To Zeromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assurance that ART and PrEP would prevent HIV has led to an increase in condomless sexual activity 31 . Although the substantial increased number of reported cases of STIs is not proven to be a direct consequence of a decreased use of condoms or change in sexual behaviors, 9 it has served to reignite interest in the idea of STI and HIV epidemiologic synergism 32 . Awareness that an STI could enhance the transmission and chance of becoming infected with HIV first gained attention after it was established that genital herpes simplex facilitated the spread of this retrovirus 33 .…”
Section: Possible Reasons For the Increase In Stismentioning
Advances in development of antiretroviral therapy and increased utilization of pre-exposure prophylaxis agents have effectively decreased the incidence of HIV sexual transmission. Conversely, at the same moment, there is an epidemic of other sexually transmitted infections in similar high-risk populations that is increasing at an alarming rate. This review aims to provide a summary of the origins and benefits of the Undetectable = Untransmittable (U=U) HIV campaign and the positive impact it has had on HIV prevention, while addressing the concomitant need for implementation of effective strategies to prevent further rise in sexually transmitted infections.
issue of JAMA, 1 some data were incorrect, owing to incomplete reporting of results in the accompanying Evidence Review. 2 In the Supporting Evidence section, Benefits of Preventive Medication subsection, in the paragraph beginning "One trial, DISCOVER (n = 5335)…," the sample size reported for the DISCOVER trial as 5335 should have been 5387, and the relative risk data reported at the end of that paragraph as RR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.19-1.14]) should have been RR, 0.53 [95% CI,). In the Harms of Preventive Medication subsection, in the paragraph beginning "An additional concern…," the sample size reported for the DISCOVER trial as 5335 should have been 5387, and the number of patients who tested positive for HIV reported as 19 should have been 20. This article has been corrected online.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.