2021
DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preexisting Somatic Mutations of Estrogen Receptor Alpha (ESR1) in Early-Stage Primary Breast Cancer

Abstract: Background More than three-quarters of primary breast cancers are positive for estrogen receptor alpha (ER; encoded by the gene ESR1 ), the most important factor for directing anti-estrogenic endocrine therapy (ET). Recently, mutations in ESR1 were identified as acquired mechanisms of resistance to ET, found in 12% to 55% of metastatic breast cancers treated previously with ET. Methods We analyzed 3217 population-bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, a broad sequencing-based assay, like RNA-sequencing, to generate generic transcriptome data, from which a multitude of different readouts can be derived, presents an attractive alternative. In addition to the current study suggesting that RNA-sequencing can provide benchmarked intrinsic subtype and ROR scores, RNA-sequencing has also been reported to be able to provide reliable models for current conventional BC biomarkers 29 , 32 , 33 and to identify expressed somatic mutations in for example ESR1 and PIK3CA 43 , 44 that may be important for future clinical management. Moreover, an upfront testing of all breast cancer cases would cut lead-times for molecular assay results and may also allow future implementation of prognostic or treatment predictive signatures in additional clinical subgroups, like TNBC and HER2 -amplified cases, for which there are none in clinical use today.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In this context, a broad sequencing-based assay, like RNA-sequencing, to generate generic transcriptome data, from which a multitude of different readouts can be derived, presents an attractive alternative. In addition to the current study suggesting that RNA-sequencing can provide benchmarked intrinsic subtype and ROR scores, RNA-sequencing has also been reported to be able to provide reliable models for current conventional BC biomarkers 29 , 32 , 33 and to identify expressed somatic mutations in for example ESR1 and PIK3CA 43 , 44 that may be important for future clinical management. Moreover, an upfront testing of all breast cancer cases would cut lead-times for molecular assay results and may also allow future implementation of prognostic or treatment predictive signatures in additional clinical subgroups, like TNBC and HER2 -amplified cases, for which there are none in clinical use today.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In this context, a broad sequencing-based assay, like RNA-sequencing, to generate generic transcriptome data, from which a multitude of different readouts can be derived, presents an attractive alternative. In addition to the current study suggesting that RNA-sequencing can provide benchmarked intrinsic subtype and ROR scores, RNAsequencing has also been reported to be able to provide reliable models for current conventional BC biomarkers 23,48,49 and to identify expressed somatic mutations in for example ESR1 and PIK3CA 58,59 that may be important for future clinical management. Moreover, an upfront testing of breast cancer cases irrespective of subtype would cut lead-times for molecular assay results and may also allow future implementation of prognostic/treatment predictive signatures for clinical subgroups, like TNBC and HER2amplified cases, for which there are none in clinical use today.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…From this cohort, we analyzed RNA-seq data from 3207 patients with longer follow-up (diagnosed between 1 September 2010 and 31 March 2015). The present cohort is a subset of the previously described cohort of 3217 patients 46 48 , which has been reduced to 3207 samples due to additional quality controls. The clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1 and are in concordance with the typical clinicopathological properties of breast cancer patients in Sweden.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%