2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7187(03)00048-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preemptive mergers under spatial competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, acquisition may be used to exclude potential rivals from preferential positions in the market. In this case, the goal of the merger is not to increase productivity or research efficiency, but to increase market power (Salant, Switzer, and Reynolds, 1983), or even to preempt mergers by rival companies (Brito, 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, acquisition may be used to exclude potential rivals from preferential positions in the market. In this case, the goal of the merger is not to increase productivity or research efficiency, but to increase market power (Salant, Switzer, and Reynolds, 1983), or even to preempt mergers by rival companies (Brito, 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the case of a bilateral merger between any pair of neighboring banks. Further, Brito (2003) shows that, in a circular city model, closing one of the locations is not profitable for the merged entity. Thus, for analysing the effect of a merger on the risk taking behaviour of banks, we make the following assumption.…”
Section: Bank Mergermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of mergers in spatial competition models are studied, among others, by Levy and Reitzes (1992) and Brito (2003). It is shown that mergers generally lead to a price increase.…”
Section: Bank Mergermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schmalensee, 1978;Lane, 1980;and Urban et al, 1986;Brito, 2003) also suggested that market pioneers can pre-empt entry by being the first to occupy preferred locations. This is especially important at the retail level where strategic retail locations are scarce.…”
Section: Pre-emption Based On Channel Exclusivitymentioning
confidence: 99%