2008
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00442.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preeclamptic sera induce nephrin shedding from podocytes through endothelin-1 release by endothelial glomerular cells

Abstract: In preeclampsia (PE), proteinuria has been associated with a reduced expression of nephrin by podocytes. In the present study, we investigated in vitro on human cultured podocytes the mechanism responsible for nephrin loss in PE. Sera from patients with PE did not directly downregulate the expression of nephrin. In contrast, conditioned medium obtained from glomerular endothelial cells incubated with PE sera induced loss of nephrin and synaptopodin, but not of podocin, from podocytes. Nephrin loss was related … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
115
2
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
10
115
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, WT sFlt-1 mice treated with ET-1 develop renal phenotypes similar to eNOS 2/2 sFlt-1 mice, evidenced by more severe albuminuria, decreased CCr, severe endotheliosis, and foot process effacement (Supplemental Figures S1 and S2). Our results are consistent with studies showing the association of ET-1 with pre-eclampsia [17][18][19] and with a recent study showing that sFlt-1 increases ET-1 expression in glomerular endothelial cells, 26 that ET-1 binds to its receptor in podocytes and causes nephrin shedding and proteinuria, and that an ET A receptor antagonist N-acetyl-[D-TRP 16 ]-ET1 fragment 16-21 abolishes these serial effects. 26 Taken together, our results indicate that the activated ET system is responsible for pre-eclampsia-like phenotypes observed in WT sFlt-1 and eNOS 2/2 sFlt-1 mice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, WT sFlt-1 mice treated with ET-1 develop renal phenotypes similar to eNOS 2/2 sFlt-1 mice, evidenced by more severe albuminuria, decreased CCr, severe endotheliosis, and foot process effacement (Supplemental Figures S1 and S2). Our results are consistent with studies showing the association of ET-1 with pre-eclampsia [17][18][19] and with a recent study showing that sFlt-1 increases ET-1 expression in glomerular endothelial cells, 26 that ET-1 binds to its receptor in podocytes and causes nephrin shedding and proteinuria, and that an ET A receptor antagonist N-acetyl-[D-TRP 16 ]-ET1 fragment 16-21 abolishes these serial effects. 26 Taken together, our results indicate that the activated ET system is responsible for pre-eclampsia-like phenotypes observed in WT sFlt-1 and eNOS 2/2 sFlt-1 mice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results are consistent with studies showing the association of ET-1 with pre-eclampsia [17][18][19] and with a recent study showing that sFlt-1 increases ET-1 expression in glomerular endothelial cells, 26 that ET-1 binds to its receptor in podocytes and causes nephrin shedding and proteinuria, and that an ET A receptor antagonist N-acetyl-[D-TRP 16 ]-ET1 fragment 16-21 abolishes these serial effects. 26 Taken together, our results indicate that the activated ET system is responsible for pre-eclampsia-like phenotypes observed in WT sFlt-1 and eNOS 2/2 sFlt-1 mice. Because ambrisentan decreases the increase in BP by sFlt-1, it cannot be ruled out that the enhanced effect of sFlt-1 on albuminuria observed in the eNOS 2/2 mice could, in part, be due to their higher BP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…24 VEGF blockade induced ET-1 release from cultured glomerular endothelial cells, and the conditioned medium thus obtained triggered nephrin loss from podocytes. Conditioned medium obtained from cells incubated with PE sera induced a similar effect, which could be reversed by ET-1 receptor antagonist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…40 Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on total RNA extracted from cells used to produce MVs and from an MV preparation different from those used for microarray analysis. Cell cDNA was used to evaluate primers efficiency.…”
Section: Quantitative Real Time Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%