2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preeclampsia in healthy women and endothelial dysfunction 10 years later

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
62
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study looked at CVD risk factors 10 years after preeclampsia in otherwise healthy women, defined as no diabetes, rheumatic disease, hypertension, renal disease, CVD, or previous preeclamptic pregnancies. 70 While preeclampsia in previously healthy women was not associated with more traditional risk factors, such as BMI, intima-media thickness, and fat mass, these women were more likely to have lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated markers of endothelial dysfunction (urate and sFlt-1), supporting the association of preeclampsia, vascular dysfunction, and future CVD risk in women. 70 After pregnancy, women with a history of preeclampsia display a wide range of differences in CVD risk compared to women with a history of normotensive pregnancies.…”
Section: Preeclampsia and Cvd Riskmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study looked at CVD risk factors 10 years after preeclampsia in otherwise healthy women, defined as no diabetes, rheumatic disease, hypertension, renal disease, CVD, or previous preeclamptic pregnancies. 70 While preeclampsia in previously healthy women was not associated with more traditional risk factors, such as BMI, intima-media thickness, and fat mass, these women were more likely to have lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated markers of endothelial dysfunction (urate and sFlt-1), supporting the association of preeclampsia, vascular dysfunction, and future CVD risk in women. 70 After pregnancy, women with a history of preeclampsia display a wide range of differences in CVD risk compared to women with a history of normotensive pregnancies.…”
Section: Preeclampsia and Cvd Riskmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…70 While preeclampsia in previously healthy women was not associated with more traditional risk factors, such as BMI, intima-media thickness, and fat mass, these women were more likely to have lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated markers of endothelial dysfunction (urate and sFlt-1), supporting the association of preeclampsia, vascular dysfunction, and future CVD risk in women. 70 After pregnancy, women with a history of preeclampsia display a wide range of differences in CVD risk compared to women with a history of normotensive pregnancies. 71 A meta-analysis of 15 studies found that women with a history of hypertension in pregnancy had elevated biochemical CVD risk factors, including glucose (10 studies), insulin (5 studies), total cholesterol (11 studies), low-density lipoprotein (10 studies), and triglycerides (10 studies).…”
Section: Preeclampsia and Cvd Riskmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Binding of these antibodies to the angiotensin 1 receptor has been shown to induce endothelial damage and may be a mechanistic link between preeclampsia and subsequent CVD risk 34. However, the relationship between preeclampsia and endothelial dysfunction is controversial, as other studies have failed to find an association between preeclampsia and functional markers of endothelial dysfunction, such as flow‐mediated dilation 35, 36. Moreover, these studies are small and limited in duration of follow‐up.…”
Section: Pathophysiology and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46][47] Subclinical atherosclerosis is commonly assessed by carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), coronary artery calcium score (CACS), coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). [5,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] In recent years, some groups have started to evaluate these imaging techniques in former preeclampsia patients, as discussed below.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most studies, cIMT is increased in women after an episode of a hypertensive pregnancy [5, 49-51, 53, 55], although numbers are small and one study could not confirm these findings. [54] Furthermore, the added value of including cIMT in the current risk profiles in the general population is uncertain and it is not likely to improve risk classification. [15,65] Given the limited data available, it is unknown to what extend cIMT contributes to risk classification in formerly preeclamptic women.…”
Section: Carotid Intima-media Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%