2018
DOI: 10.1159/000487646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preeclampsia as a Form of Type 5 Cardiorenal Syndrome: An Underrecognized Entity in Women’s Cardiovascular Health

Abstract: Background: Preeclampsia is a multisystem vascular disorder of pregnancy that remains a leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Preeclampsia remains an underrecognized risk factor for future cardiovascular and kidney disease in women and represents the confluence of preexisting vascular risk factors with superimposed endothelial injury from placental mediated anti-angiogenic factors. Summary: This review highlights the close relationship between preeclampsia and future cardiovascular and k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(77 reference statements)
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, follow-up after a PE episode is not established. [1][2][3][4][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] There are several reasons why the results of the analyses of these long-term health effects are not fully clear: the pathogenesis of PE is only partially understood; the recent trend Delivery before the 34th wk of gestation, blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg, and proteinuria >300 mg/24 h. f Diastolic blood pressure $90 mm Hg with proteinuria ($0.3 g/24 h) diagnosed between the 20th and 32nd wk of gestation. g Diastolic pressure >90 mm Hg on 2 occasions at least 4 h apart or a single reading of >110 mm Hg; from the 20th wk of gestation onward in a previously normotensive woman plus at least 1 episode of proteinuria of 0.3 g/24 h. Increased BP after the 20th wk of gestation (>140/90 mm Hg) and proteinuria (>0.3 g in a 24-h urine specimen or $1þ on a urinary dipstick reading).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a consequence, follow-up after a PE episode is not established. [1][2][3][4][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] There are several reasons why the results of the analyses of these long-term health effects are not fully clear: the pathogenesis of PE is only partially understood; the recent trend Delivery before the 34th wk of gestation, blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg, and proteinuria >300 mg/24 h. f Diastolic blood pressure $90 mm Hg with proteinuria ($0.3 g/24 h) diagnosed between the 20th and 32nd wk of gestation. g Diastolic pressure >90 mm Hg on 2 occasions at least 4 h apart or a single reading of >110 mm Hg; from the 20th wk of gestation onward in a previously normotensive woman plus at least 1 episode of proteinuria of 0.3 g/24 h. Increased BP after the 20th wk of gestation (>140/90 mm Hg) and proteinuria (>0.3 g in a 24-h urine specimen or $1þ on a urinary dipstick reading).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between CKD and PE is likewise complex and non-univocal: on the one hand, PE may be a cause or a marker of future CKD; on the other hand, there is an increased occurrence of PE in patients with CKD and many predisposing factors, including diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and hypertension, are shared by PE and CKD. [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]69 Available evidence allows us to conclude that there is an increased risk of kidney diseases after PE, but does not permit us to quantify that risk, something which must be done if follow-up strategies are to be defined. What distinguishes our review from the meta-analysis carried out by McDonald et al is not only the inclusion of recent studies but also the focus on studies that include only medium-to long-term follow-up (at least 4 years, instead of at least 6 weeks postpartum).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there is increasing evidence that some women experience sustained renal dysfunction, and large cohort studies have reported an increased risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) [ 7 10 ]. Biological mechanisms are uncertain; this may be due to lasting vascular endothelial dysfunction related to elevated levels of anti-angiogenic proteins—such as soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1—or it may be due to direct glomerular damage related to underexpression of nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2 (NRF-2) [ 11 13 ]. Other changes in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, metabolic system, and factors causing endothelial dysfunction may also be involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%