Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a spectrum of diseases encompassing chronic hypertension, diagnosed prior to 20 weeks' gestation; gestational hypertension, diagnosed after 20 weeks' gestation; and preeclampsia, which, in addition to gestational hypertension, is characterized by systemic features and often proteinuria. 1 The prevalence of HDP has been increasing, with HDP reported in 15.9% of all delivery-associated hospitalizations in 2019, compared with 13.3% in 2017. 2 HDP are associated with severe maternal complications, such as heart attack and stroke, and among the leading causes of maternal mortality in the United States. 2 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaskan Native and non-Hispanic Black populations bear a disproportionate amount of disease burden, as do individuals in the lowest median household income quartile or delivering in the South or Midwest Census regions. 2 Since there is no cure for HDP, current strategies have focused on screening and prompt diagnosis to enable surveillance and timely delivery in an effort to avoid complications. 1 In 2017, United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening for preeclampsia with blood pressure (BP) measurements throughout pregnancy. 3 The updated 2023 USPSTF recommendations 4,5 expand their focus from screening for preeclampsia, to screening for the entire HDP spectrum of diseases (B recommendation), since all can be effectively screened with BP measurements and all lead to pregnancy-associated morbidity. Since the benefit of screening for elevated BP during pregnancy has been previously established, the USPSTF critically reviewed the evidence for varied screening approaches. 4,5
Home BP MeasurementThe Blood Pressure Monitoring in High Risk Pregnancy to Improve the Detection and Monitoring of Hypertension trial, 6 a large, randomized clinical trial, evaluated the use of home BP monitoring, in addition to routine prenatal care. The addition of home BP measurements did not change the frequency of HDP diagnosis, the number of days needed to detect HDP, the frequency of preeclampsia diagnosis, or perinatal outcomes. 6
Reduced Prenatal Screening Visits for Patients Deemed Low RiskUSPSTF assessed 3 randomized clinical trials on reduced prenatal screening visits for patients considered to be a low risk, such as a 1996 study by McDuffie et al. 7 These studies did not find any differences in perinatal outcomes. Specifically, preterm delivery, incidence of preeclampsia, or Cesarean delivery were not different between the reduced visit and control groups.
Indicated Rather Than Routine Screening for ProteinuriaA nonrandomized study by Rhode et al 8 used historical controls to assess indicated urine screening for conditions in pregnancy, such as urinary tract infection. Rhode et al 8 found no difference in the proportion of individuals diagnosed with HDP. 8 Consequently, the USPSTF found inadequate evidence that this approach is more accurate than regular blood pressure measurement, given the lack of demonstrated benefit. 4,5...