2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2012.6214128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predistortion performance considering peak to average power ratio reduction in OFDM context

Abstract: Abstract-Some recent communication systems like DVB-T2 standard set up a PAPR reduction technique followed by a linearization's one. So in such a scenario, the performance of the linearization is influenced undoubtedly by the PAPR reduction method. In this paper, we revisit the EVM metric and evaluate a closed form regarding the performance of both the PAPR reduction technique and the linearization's one. We choose the predistortion as a linearization technique and define a predistortion error. Assuming that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our first contribution consists in providing EVM expressions as a function of the transmitted power, the clipping threshold, and the PA and predistortion characteristics, as well as the PAPR of the input and clipped signals. As far as theoretical EVM derivations are concerned, some upper-bounds can be found in [26,27], and other contributions, as [28][29][30], give closed-form EVM expressions but modeling the RF front end as a simple clipping. To the best of our knowledge, despite numerous studies in the literature about PAPR, no analytical expression of the EVM, taking into account all the above mentioned parameters, exists in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our first contribution consists in providing EVM expressions as a function of the transmitted power, the clipping threshold, and the PA and predistortion characteristics, as well as the PAPR of the input and clipped signals. As far as theoretical EVM derivations are concerned, some upper-bounds can be found in [26,27], and other contributions, as [28][29][30], give closed-form EVM expressions but modeling the RF front end as a simple clipping. To the best of our knowledge, despite numerous studies in the literature about PAPR, no analytical expression of the EVM, taking into account all the above mentioned parameters, exists in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown above, the traditional predistortion can be expressed as an adding signal technique and we introduced its operating principle. The additional signal for the PA's non-linearity compensation is given by (19). As we can note, this algorithm is based on the assumption that the predistortion function is known.…”
Section: Error Compensation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second axis is based on the evaluation of the signal distortions due to the HPA non-linearities that reflects the performance of the different PAPR reduction techniques. Accordingly, the authors in [15] provided an upper bound of the EVM for the PAPR clipping method. In [16]- [19] the authors independently calculated the EVM due to clipping without considering the HPA impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%