Optical Fiber Communication 1990
DOI: 10.1364/ofc.1990.wh6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predistortion linearization of directly modulated DFB lasers and external modulators for AM video transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the inherent nonlinearities of the light sources produce distortions that limit the performances of the overall system. It seems most difficult Manuscript to implement an equalization circuit to compensate for the generated harmonics and intermodulation products (IMP's), even if the existing alternatives, such as electronic predistortion or feedforward compensation techniques, have allowed a nonnegligible improvement of the laser linearity [7] and [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the inherent nonlinearities of the light sources produce distortions that limit the performances of the overall system. It seems most difficult Manuscript to implement an equalization circuit to compensate for the generated harmonics and intermodulation products (IMP's), even if the existing alternatives, such as electronic predistortion or feedforward compensation techniques, have allowed a nonnegligible improvement of the laser linearity [7] and [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main impairment of feedforward compensation is the difficulty of generating an accurate error signal. Another solution is based on predistortion, a method that consists of passing the modulation current through an adequate nonlinear element such that when the modified input signal is applied to the laser, an undistorted output results [14]. The main disadvantage with predistortion is the complexity of the electrical circuit to be designed and the difficulty of controlling the harmonics and IMD's at the same time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, laboratory test results in most literatures are frequently presented assuming the noise floor at -160dBm considering the typical fiber-optic link parameters [50][51][52]. By using -160dBm as noise floor, our measured SFDR is within 110±3dB/Hz 2/3 over the modulation frequency range 2-8GHz, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 83%