1994
DOI: 10.1021/ja00088a069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predisposition of prion protein homozygotes to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease can be explained by a nucleation-dependent polymerization mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important example of this point is sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease that occurs predominantly in individuals that are homozygous with respect to a common prion protein polymorphism at codon 129, resulting in either a Met or a Val residue (45). Our findings that a mixture of cc␤-p and cc␤-Met aggregates much more slowly than does either of these peptides in isolation suggest that a mismatch in hydrophobic interactions could explain the slower aggregation process in deposition diseases that afflict heterozygotic individuals (46).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…An important example of this point is sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease that occurs predominantly in individuals that are homozygous with respect to a common prion protein polymorphism at codon 129, resulting in either a Met or a Val residue (45). Our findings that a mixture of cc␤-p and cc␤-Met aggregates much more slowly than does either of these peptides in isolation suggest that a mismatch in hydrophobic interactions could explain the slower aggregation process in deposition diseases that afflict heterozygotic individuals (46).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Genetic studies have indicated that the PrP genotype strongly influences the host susceptibility of TSE agents from different species (15)(16)(17). Other studies have indicated that compatibility between PrPc and PrPsc molecules is required for efficient PrPsc accumulation (18)(19)(20)(21)(22). This compatibility requirement suggested that PrPsc and PrPc may interact during PrPsc formation as had been proposed earlier (3,23,24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This raises the questions of whether the preferred intermediates contain one or both variants and whether one variant can inhibit fibrillization of another. This issue has been approached experimentally for other amyloidogenic proteins by using peptide models of A␤ variants and the polymorphic forms of the prion protein (27,44). The kinetic data discussed above could be reconciled with the genetic data by a mechanism in which a nonfibrillar pathogenic oligomer accumulates in both mixed incubations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods of fibril quantitation showed a distinct lag phase for fibril formation, which is typical of amyloid fibrillizations and suggests that fibril formation may be nucleation-dependent ( Fig. 1) (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Consistent with that proposal, addition of preformed ␣-synuclein fibrils comprising WT, A53T, or A30P (1-2% by moles) to an incubation containing the identical protein resulted in a significant reduction in the lag time for appearance of a Thio T signal (lag time for A53T at 200 M is ca.…”
Section: Fibril Formation Is Nucleation-dependent and Can Be Seeded Bymentioning
confidence: 99%