2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency After Le Fort I Maxillary Advancement in Patients With Cleft Palate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
2
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
38
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These five patients were also found to have borderline VPD preoperatively. The results of their study supported those of other studies that there is no relationship between maxillary advancement and the amount of postoperative velopharyngeal disorders [71], and when orthognathic surgery and total maxillary distraction are compared in terms of speech and VPD, there is no significant difference [71][72][73]. Additionally, the finding that there is no correlation between postoperative speech impediment and preoperative borderline VPD was added to the literature which reported similar findings [71][72][73].…”
Section: Speech Impedimentsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These five patients were also found to have borderline VPD preoperatively. The results of their study supported those of other studies that there is no relationship between maxillary advancement and the amount of postoperative velopharyngeal disorders [71], and when orthognathic surgery and total maxillary distraction are compared in terms of speech and VPD, there is no significant difference [71][72][73]. Additionally, the finding that there is no correlation between postoperative speech impediment and preoperative borderline VPD was added to the literature which reported similar findings [71][72][73].…”
Section: Speech Impedimentsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Intuitively, it may seem obvious that greater magnitudes of MMA would lead to more complications and poorer skeletal stability than smaller advancements. However, data from published studies demonstrate, no decrease in skeletal stability is associated with the large advancements seen in OSA patients 35 and that velopharyngeal insufficiency is not associated with the amount of maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patients 36 . Additionally, it has been shown that the magnitude of mandibular advancement and age alone do not correlate with changes in neurosensory outcomes following bilateral sagittal split osteotomies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to these authors, those individuals who presented inadequate or marginal velopharyngeal closure before OS, objectively evaluated by measuring the size of the velopharyngeal orifice using the pressure-flow technique, were the ones who presented a deterioration of velopharyngeal function after OS. This is probably due to the extension of the soft palate before surgery and the increase in pharyngeal depth after OS, considered the most important risk factors for VPI after OS, when compared to the quantity of maxillary advancement, as demonstrated through cephalometric tracings and nasopharyngoscopy 30 . These authors suggested that patients who have a short palate in extension are at a disadvantage in relation to those with an adequate extension.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%