Abstract:Disinfection by-products (DBPs) in drinking water may be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, the results from previous epidemiological studies are not consistent, perhaps in part due to individual variation in water use and consumption. This study was performed to evaluate and describe demographic and behavioral characteristics as predictors of ingested water, showering, bathing, and swimming among pregnant women. Water use and consumption data were collected through telephone interviews with … Show more
“…In a previously published work (Forssen et al, 2007), we found that season had a strong impact on water use and consumption. Season was, therefore, adjusted for in the regression models in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…There are several previous studies describing the variation of water use in different populations (Windham et al, 1992;Shimokura et al, 1998;Williams et al, 2001;Zender et al, 2001;Barbone et al, 2002;Kaur et al, 2004;King et al, 2004;Forssen et al, 2007), but only three have examined changes in water use during pregnancy (Windham et al, 1992;Shimokura et al, 1998;Barbone et al, 2002). Shimokura et al (1998) assessed the variation in water use based on a 3-day diary among pregnant women in the US.…”
Disinfection by-products in tap water have been found in some studies to be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, but little is known about how water use and consumption might change during early pregnancy. Estimating water-related activities only at one time during pregnancy could easily lead to exposure misclassification. To evaluate changes in water use among pregnant women, we used data from a large epidemiologic study in which 1990 women were interviewed around 9 and 20 weeks' gestation. The water variables that were examined included ingestion of cold and hot tap water as well as of bottled water, showering and bathing. Changes were detected between early and mid-pregnancy for ingested cold tap water and showering. Thirtythree percent of the subjects changed cold-water ingestion by Z1.0 liters/day and 44% changed their time showering by Z35 min per week during this period. Increases in cold tap water intake were associated with age 435 years, income o$40,000, and non-Hispanic white ethnicity. We also found that the proportion of the total variation due to within-subject variability was 62% for hot tap water ingestion but only 35% for showering and B50% for cold tap water, bottled water and bathing. Limited resources in epidemiologic studies often require a decision between collecting data for a large number of people or collecting multiple measurements for a smaller number of people. The results in this study will be useful to researchers who need to determine where to invest their effort when assessing water-related exposures and should help in evaluation of previously performed studies.
“…In a previously published work (Forssen et al, 2007), we found that season had a strong impact on water use and consumption. Season was, therefore, adjusted for in the regression models in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…There are several previous studies describing the variation of water use in different populations (Windham et al, 1992;Shimokura et al, 1998;Williams et al, 2001;Zender et al, 2001;Barbone et al, 2002;Kaur et al, 2004;King et al, 2004;Forssen et al, 2007), but only three have examined changes in water use during pregnancy (Windham et al, 1992;Shimokura et al, 1998;Barbone et al, 2002). Shimokura et al (1998) assessed the variation in water use based on a 3-day diary among pregnant women in the US.…”
Disinfection by-products in tap water have been found in some studies to be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, but little is known about how water use and consumption might change during early pregnancy. Estimating water-related activities only at one time during pregnancy could easily lead to exposure misclassification. To evaluate changes in water use among pregnant women, we used data from a large epidemiologic study in which 1990 women were interviewed around 9 and 20 weeks' gestation. The water variables that were examined included ingestion of cold and hot tap water as well as of bottled water, showering and bathing. Changes were detected between early and mid-pregnancy for ingested cold tap water and showering. Thirtythree percent of the subjects changed cold-water ingestion by Z1.0 liters/day and 44% changed their time showering by Z35 min per week during this period. Increases in cold tap water intake were associated with age 435 years, income o$40,000, and non-Hispanic white ethnicity. We also found that the proportion of the total variation due to within-subject variability was 62% for hot tap water ingestion but only 35% for showering and B50% for cold tap water, bottled water and bathing. Limited resources in epidemiologic studies often require a decision between collecting data for a large number of people or collecting multiple measurements for a smaller number of people. The results in this study will be useful to researchers who need to determine where to invest their effort when assessing water-related exposures and should help in evaluation of previously performed studies.
“…Whereas they were older and more often employed than the non-participant women, age and employment have been described as associated only with filtered tap water ingestion during pregnancy, not with total tap water ingestion. 4,10 Estimates of Water Ingestion Tap water ingestion represented 71% of total water ingestion. With similar definition of water ingestion and data collection procedures relatively similar to ours, Forssé n et al 5 7 Proportion of tap water ingestion of EDDS women seemed to be comparable to that in English-speaking countries and lower than that in other Mediterranean countries, such as Italy or Spain.…”
Section: Water-use Habits Of Pregnant French Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They comprised questions chosen following an intensive review of the literature on water-use habits (Supplementary File 4) and exposure assessment questionnaire design. 18 The questionnaires had five sections: (i) socioeconomic data, 19 (ii) medical data, (iii) history of professional exposure, (iv) dermal water exposure, 4,5,[8][9][10] (v) drinking-water and bottled water ingestion frequency, 4-6,8-10 (vi) diet questions (rate of cans, fresh fruit and vegetable consumption), (vii) alcohol and tobacco consumption and (viii) cosmetics type and use frequency.…”
Section: Recruitment and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Some studies have also assessed predictors of water-use habits during pregnancy. 4,5,9,10 Water ingestion is contingent on geographical and cultural factors; 1 so it is necessary to adapt data to the local context. Only one study has assessed water-use habits of French pregnant women.…”
The aim of the present study, a part of the Endocrine Disruptor Deux-Sèvres (EDDS) cohort study, was to estimate water-use habits of pregnant French women. The study population consisted of 132 pregnant women living in Deux-Sèvres (France) in 2012-2013, in areas where drinking water is exclusively produced by surface water. Drinking-water data included ingested water (tap, bottled and filtered) and ingestion place (home, work and elsewhere). Dermal contact with water included showering, bathing, swimming, spa use, hand-washing and other water activities. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews at second and third trimesters of pregnancy with a 1-day-recall questionnaire. Intertrimestral differences in water-use habits were assessed. Predictors of water ingestion and duration of dermal contact with water were assessed with multiple linear regressions. At the second trimester of pregnancy, the mean total drinking-water ingestion was 1.8±0.6 l per day (mean and SD), 71% of which was tap water. Total drinking-water ingestion was not different between both trimesters but ingestion place differed. Dermal contact with water estimate was 188±118 and 173±92 min/week at second and third trimesters, respectively. Smoking increased water ingestion 777 ml/day 95% CI (171-1384). Duration of dermal contact in spring was 30 min/week 95% CI (13-48) higher than in winter. Obese women spend 26 min/week 95% CI (2-50) more showering than women with recommended weight. Our estimates of pregnant French women's exposure to water will help researchers to better assess water pollutant risks.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.