2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10865-019-00021-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of transitions in firearm assault behavior among drug-using youth presenting to an urban emergency department

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the observational studies, nine (20%) publications focused on psychiatric issues; specifically, they focused on lethal means counseling and access to firearms among patients presenting with suicidal ideation. 10 , 11 , 25 , 26 , 37 , 38 , 45 , 50 , 63 Twenty-four publications attempted to characterize firearm violence, studying the prevalence of firearm access (2%) 51 and injuries (15%), 24 , 27 , 41 , 44 , 48 , 57 , 68 behavioral risk factors for firearm violence (11%), 9 , 12 , 13 , 31 , 42 characteristics of patients presenting for firearm injuries (24%), 14 , 17 , 21 , 30 , 36 , 39 , 40 , 52 54 , 58 and the severity of firearm injuries (4%). 34 , 35 Two studies (4%) looked into developing screening tools to predict future risk of firearm violence, 22 , 31 and five (11%) assessed patient and provider attitudes toward asking about firearm access and safety in the ED.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the observational studies, nine (20%) publications focused on psychiatric issues; specifically, they focused on lethal means counseling and access to firearms among patients presenting with suicidal ideation. 10 , 11 , 25 , 26 , 37 , 38 , 45 , 50 , 63 Twenty-four publications attempted to characterize firearm violence, studying the prevalence of firearm access (2%) 51 and injuries (15%), 24 , 27 , 41 , 44 , 48 , 57 , 68 behavioral risk factors for firearm violence (11%), 9 , 12 , 13 , 31 , 42 characteristics of patients presenting for firearm injuries (24%), 14 , 17 , 21 , 30 , 36 , 39 , 40 , 52 54 , 58 and the severity of firearm injuries (4%). 34 , 35 Two studies (4%) looked into developing screening tools to predict future risk of firearm violence, 22 , 31 and five (11%) assessed patient and provider attitudes toward asking about firearm access and safety in the ED.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, authors entered all social support variables and covariates into the model, allowing each variable to have a unique coefficient per transition. Next, following a method employed by Goldstick and colleagues (Goldstick, Carter, et al, 2019;, the team individually tested whether each variable's effect on future PTS differed depending on the current PTS state with a series of likelihood ratio tests. Specifically, the team tested whether the No-PTS -> PTS adjusted hazard ratio for each variable included in the model (i.e., fourteen variables) was equivalent to the inverse of the adjusted hazard ratio from PTS -> No-PTS, which amounts to a test of whether the likelihood of being in the PTS state given the value of the specific variable differs depending on the current state (Goldstick, Carter, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, following a method employed by Goldstick and colleagues (Goldstick, Carter, et al, 2019;, the team individually tested whether each variable's effect on future PTS differed depending on the current PTS state with a series of likelihood ratio tests. Specifically, the team tested whether the No-PTS -> PTS adjusted hazard ratio for each variable included in the model (i.e., fourteen variables) was equivalent to the inverse of the adjusted hazard ratio from PTS -> No-PTS, which amounts to a test of whether the likelihood of being in the PTS state given the value of the specific variable differs depending on the current state (Goldstick, Carter, et al, 2019). Finally, the team constructed a final model, with covariate effects constrained to be state-invariant, except those that we found to have significant state-dependence in the prior step.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, youth who never used a firearm were more likely to engage in firearm aggression within the next 24 months if they had higher levels of retaliatory attitudes (Goldstick et al, 2019). Alternatively, youth who have engaged in firearm aggression were more likely to engage in firearm aggression in the future if they endorsed higher levels of retaliatory attitudes (Goldstick et al, 2019). To better understand how retaliatory attitudes might be linked with violent behaviors, such as firearm aggression, researchers have applied social–cognitive theory (Crick & Dodge, 1994; Copeland-Linder et al, 2012).…”
Section: Exposure To Violence and Firearm Aggressionmentioning
confidence: 99%