2003
DOI: 10.1177/153331750301800211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of successful relationships in a peer support program for Alzheimer's caregivers

Abstract: This study explores the role of similarity in the success of peer support relationships in an intervention program for dementia caregivers. Hypothesized predictors of successful matches included structural similarity between partners (e.g., in age, education), appraisal similarity (e.g., in satisfaction with support for caregiving), and psychological similarity (e.g., in psychological well-being). Contrary to expectations, no relationship between these types of similarity and the success of the match were foun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested by previous research (Sabir, et al, 2003), we expected engagement in peer activity to affect care-specific outcomes, but no significant effects were seen in our sample. Nevertheless, because caregivers who feel more burdened or depressed might be more likely to seek out formal peer support activities, longitudinal research will be needed to determine whether engagement in peer support is ultimately beneficial for those at risk of psychological distress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As suggested by previous research (Sabir, et al, 2003), we expected engagement in peer activity to affect care-specific outcomes, but no significant effects were seen in our sample. Nevertheless, because caregivers who feel more burdened or depressed might be more likely to seek out formal peer support activities, longitudinal research will be needed to determine whether engagement in peer support is ultimately beneficial for those at risk of psychological distress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Social activity also is an important means of coping with caregiving stress (Haley, Levine, Brown, & Bartolucci, 1987; Pearlin, Mullan, Semple, & Skaff, 1990; Thompson, Futterman, Gallagher-Thompson, Rose, & Lovett, 1993). It allows caregivers to temporarily escape the responsibilities of caregiving (Barusch, 1988; Bedini & Guinan, 1996) and participate in peer support activities, which provide important opportunities for sharing both stressful and rewarding experiences (Sabir, Pillemer, Suitor, & Patterson, 2003). Social ties and leisure activity appear to mediate the effect of care demands on depression--the effect of caregiving on depression is reduced when activity restriction is taken into account (Cannuscio et al, 2004; Mausbach, Patterson, et al, 2008; Nieboer et al, 1998; Williamson, Shaffer, & Schulz, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We match pairs to encourage longer and more satisfying peer support relationships [26]. The role of the CS is to provide emotional and informational support to the family carer, offer family carers a listening ear, and signpost them to local services and other useful contacts and resources.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no main effect of face‐to‐face peer support on depression or self‐esteem, but support did reduce the depressive effect of disruptive behaviour, suggesting a buffering effect (Pillemer & Suitor , Sabir et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%