2018
DOI: 10.1002/dev.21626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of social instability stress effects on social interaction and anxiety in adolescent male rats

Abstract: Adolescence is an important phase of development of social behaviors, which may be disrupted by the experience of stressors. We previously reported that exposure to social instability stress in adolescence (SS; postnatal day [PND] 30–45) in rats reduced social interactions with unfamiliar peers compared with non‐stressed controls (CTL). In experiment 1, we replicated the effect of SS on social interaction and found that the pattern of neural activations based on Fos immunohistochemistry in brain regions during… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to saccharin preference and behavior in the open field and elevated-plus maze, active social interaction was only affected by hippocampal-kindling, but not in response to amygdala-kindling. Social isolation and disorganized social interaction complexity have been reported previously as a consequence of distress [37][38][39]. Thus, the increase in active social interaction in the absence of aggressive behavior is rather not interpreted as an indicator of an increased level of distress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In contrast to saccharin preference and behavior in the open field and elevated-plus maze, active social interaction was only affected by hippocampal-kindling, but not in response to amygdala-kindling. Social isolation and disorganized social interaction complexity have been reported previously as a consequence of distress [37][38][39]. Thus, the increase in active social interaction in the absence of aggressive behavior is rather not interpreted as an indicator of an increased level of distress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Exposure to RSD produced a short-term deficit of social interaction. This reduction of the ISI in defeated mice has been associated with the social avoidance that characterizes affective disorders (Golden et al, 2011), and has been repeatedly observed after RSD or social instability (Krishnan et al, 2007;Golden et al, 2011;Henriques-Alves and Queiroz, 2016;Browne et al, 2018;Dong et al, 2018;Hodges et al, 2018). Furthermore, the ISI is the most used measure to distinguish between mice that are resilient or vulnerable to the effects of different models of social defeat (Krishnan et al, 2007;Chaudhury et al, 2013;Donahue et al, 2014;Friedman et al, 2014;Hodes et al, 2014;Isingrini et al, 2016;Sun et al, 2016;Nelson et al, 2018;Prabhu et al, 2018;Gururajan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resilience To the Long-term Effects Of Rsd On Cocaine Cpp Ismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The influence that the novelty-seeking trait exerts on vulnerability to stress and drug use has been repeatedly demonstrated (Kabbaj et al, 2001;Duclot et al, 2011;Vidal-Infer et al, 2012;Duclot and Kabbaj, 2013;Clinton et al, 2014;Hodges et al, 2018). In particular, novelty-seeking behavior is one of the personality factors that may explain individual differences in vulnerability to drug abuse (Dellu et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resilience To the Long-term Effects Of Rsd On Cocaine Cpp Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, whether our results suggest a positive effect of social interaction on reducing CPP for cocaine, it could constitute a key element within treatment avenues. In addition, we analysed the pattern of c-Fos expression which has shown to be a reliable marker to characterise neuronal activation in brain regions involved in addiction circuitry (Cruz et al, 2015; Kabbaj and Akil, 2001; Regier et al, 2012) as well as in social interaction (Hodges et al, 2018; Perkins et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%