2013
DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2013.820783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Social Entrepreneurship Success: A Cross-national Analysis of Antecedent Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our results, during the crisis the influence of perceived opportunities on social entrepreneurship increased 37 % compared with the period before the crisis. Similar to previous results (Lehner & Kaniskas, 2012;Roy et al, 2014;Tominc & Rebernik, 2007), perceived opportunities are found to be related to entrepreneurial intentions and are a key driver in the decision to start a new business.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our results, during the crisis the influence of perceived opportunities on social entrepreneurship increased 37 % compared with the period before the crisis. Similar to previous results (Lehner & Kaniskas, 2012;Roy et al, 2014;Tominc & Rebernik, 2007), perceived opportunities are found to be related to entrepreneurial intentions and are a key driver in the decision to start a new business.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the social entrepreneurship area, Perrini, Vurro, and Costanzo (2010) describe how social entrepreneurial opportunities are identified, evaluated, exploited and scaled up. According to the study conducted by Roy, Brumagim, and Goll (2014), perceived opportunity is negatively correlated with social entrepreneurship at country level. Additionally, several authors point out the relevance of the ability to embrace opportunities in the social entrepreneurial process (Austin, Stevenson, & Wei-Skillern, 2006;Corner & Ho, 2010;Dorado & Ventresca, 2013;Haugh, 2005;Mair & Marti, 2006;Zahra, Rawhouser, Bhawe, Neubaum, & Hayton, 2008).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Overall, social entrepreneurship definitions focus on social values, innovation, community development, and social sustainability. The main difference between entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurship lies in its motivation and goals (Roy, Brumagim, & Goll, 2014). Although entrepreneurship can still have a positive social effect, social entrepreneurship emphasizes social values beyond economic values (Zahra, Gedajlovic, Neubaum, & Shulman, 2009).…”
Section: The Concept Of Social Entrepreneurship and Social Entrepreneursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively, Saudi Arabian participants had a degree and postgraduate qualifications outnumbering their counterparts from the UK while participants with diploma holders and high school qualifications from the UK outnumbered their counterparts from Saudi Arabia. Starting up a new business required some level of education specially to assist in understanding the support systems available for startups, the regulatory framework, and in identifying the demand gap in the market (Roy, Brumagim, &Goll, 2014). Therefore, it could be deduced that educated individuals such as those with degrees and diploma had a high level of exposure to the available startup support programs compared to those with high school education level.…”
Section: Overall Reliability Testmentioning
confidence: 99%