2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.addicn.2023.100068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of smoking cessation outcomes identified by machine learning: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emerging directions like computational methods and traditional Chinese medicine approaches may complement continued progress in established domains like cessation pharmacotherapy and public policy (Bickel et al 2023). Artificial intelligence and machine learning show great promise for advancing tobacco and nicotine research (Bendotti et al 2023)…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging directions like computational methods and traditional Chinese medicine approaches may complement continued progress in established domains like cessation pharmacotherapy and public policy (Bickel et al 2023). Artificial intelligence and machine learning show great promise for advancing tobacco and nicotine research (Bendotti et al 2023)…”
Section: Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past years, studies on ML and the combination of different ML methods have become a trend (Ren et al, 2022), and a growing body of research is applying ML in several areas, such as business -considering ML a tool that can be used in cryptocurrency research (Ren et al, 2022), for stock market prediction (Mintarya et al, 2023); in health and medical research, there are studies for prediction in medical and surgical research (Srinivas & Young, 2023), to identify the predictors of smoking (Bickel et al, 2023); ML based methodologies have also accelerated the prediction of the physical properties of materials (Magar & Farimani, 2023), and many others. However, ML is still experimental because no universal learning algorithm exists, even though the number of ML algorithms is extensive and growing (Liu et al, 2021;Nguyen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%