Predictors of Premature Termination of Day Treatment for Personality Disorder

Abstract

Background: Premature termination is a common problem in the treatment of personality disorder. Efforts to improve compliance should begin by recognising risk factors for premature termination. This prospective study identified predictors of premature termination from a day treatment program for personality disorder. Methods: Consecutively admitted patients with a personality disorder (n = 197) were assessed with self-report and interview measures. Patient personality characteristics were the primary predictors. Others were demographic, initial disturbance, and personality disorder variables. Cox proportional hazards regression was used. Results: Risk of terminating prematurely significantly increased if the patient had been previously hospitalised for psychiatric difficulties, was younger, had fewer prior contacts with health and social services, and had more severe borderline personality disorder traits. Conclusions: Information about which patients are at high risk for premature termination can help clinicians take measures to modify the risk. This might involve selection decisions, pre-treatment preparation, close monitoring during treatment, or addition of adjunctive interventions.

Predictors of dropout among personality disorders in a specialist outpatients psychosocial treatment: A preliminary study

“…The high dropout rate we found in an early phase of BPD is widely supported by previous studies and probably depends on dysfunctional personality traits of these patients that mainly affect interpersonal relationships 3–8 . The present research confirms these data and shows that dropout is strongly associated with patients' subjective perception, which is assessed through PAEQ and includes: therapeutic relationship, patients' expectations regarding the effectiveness of the treatment, and their motivation for change.…”

Effectiveness of Outpatient, Day Hospital, and Inpatient Psychotherapeutic Treatment for Patients with Cluster B Personality Disorders

“…First, even though we controlled for all observed pretreatment differences, it cannot be ruled out that results were influenced by unobserved confounders. To minimise this risk as much as possible, a broad range of possible confounders was carefully selected and measured, based on both clinical and empirical knowledge [62], including variables identified in the literature as significant predictors of therapy outcome or process, such as severity of baseline psychopathology, previous hospitalisation, and substance misuse [66,67,68,69,70,71]. Only variables significantly related to treatment outcome were included in the propensity score.…”

Effectiveness of Different Modalities of Psychotherapeutic Treatment for Patients with Cluster C Personality Disorders: Results of a Large Prospective Multicentre Study

“…To diminish this constraint as much as possible, a broad range of possible confounders was carefully selected and measured, based on both clinical and empirical knowledge [43], including variables identified in the literature as significant predictors of therapy outcome or process, such as severity of baseline psychopathology, previous hospitalisation, and substance misuse [e.g. [45,46,47,48,49,50]]. In line with these earlier findings, previous hospitalisation and substance misuse for example were significantly related to one of the secondary outcome measures, interpersonal functioning, and were therefore included in the propensity score for this measure.…”