2018
DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2018.1538990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of poor cerebral collaterals and cerebrovascular reserve in patients with chronic total carotid occlusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Although it was possible to model a number of different interaction terms between included predictors, we focused on three interactions most consistently demonstrated by existing evidence [22,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Although it was possible to model a number of different interaction terms between included predictors, we focused on three interactions most consistently demonstrated by existing evidence [22,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To add further complexity, cardiovascular risk factors may not only co-occur but also interact, affecting the manifestation of these putative protective mechanisms. Findings from clinical and preclinical models suggest that both hypertension and diabetes may impair the development of collaterals [22,[25][26][27][28][29], while diabetes also prevents ischaemic tolerance [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, many of the MRI and CT techniques employed in stroke assessment are not available elsewhere. Perfusion SPECT remains a valuable tool for assessing acute strokes prior to administering intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) ( 129 , 130 ), assessing subacute strokes for viability and size of the penumbra ( 131 , 132 ), and assessing persistent stroke-related symptoms ( 133 ). Perfusion SPECT may also contribute to stroke risk assessment ( 134 , 135 ).…”
Section: Assessment Of the State Of The Art—spect In Brain Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the model considered that the history of smoke is a protective factor against MCE and CH after MT, which was contrary to our common sense and some previous research. Smoking severely affects the cerebrovascular reserve and induces intracranial atherosclerotic changes, and it may impair cerebrovascular reactivity and lead to poor collateral circulation ( 44 , 45 ). However, a meta-analysis based on 45,826 AIS patients showed a similar result that smoking was a protective factor against MCE ( 46 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%