2020
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2019.9.44667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Patient Satisfaction and the Perceived Quality of Healthcare in an Emergency Department in Portugal

Abstract: Introduction: The predictors of patient satisfaction in emergency medicine (EM) have been widely studied and discussed in the scientific literature; the results vary depending on the specific EM attributes, cultural aspects, researchers’ preferences, and approaches. However, it is not clear whether the same predictors of patient satisfaction can contribute to a better-perceived quality of healthcare or whether patients’ perceptions form a different attitude toward satisfaction and perceived quality of healthca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,3 Factors associated with patient satisfaction in the ED have been relatively consistent during the past 2 decades, falling into the following broad categories: (1) interpersonal skills and attitude of staff (eg, courtesy, caring, concern, respect), (2) communication or providing explanations and information to patients (eg, providing instructions at discharge or explaining test results or the cause of a patients symptoms), (3) wait times, and (4) perceived standards of care. 4,5 Other studies have had similar findings 6,7 and have added factors related to the environment of the ED (eg, cleanliness, privacy). 8,9 King et al recently linked overcrowding in the ED to lower patient satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…1,3 Factors associated with patient satisfaction in the ED have been relatively consistent during the past 2 decades, falling into the following broad categories: (1) interpersonal skills and attitude of staff (eg, courtesy, caring, concern, respect), (2) communication or providing explanations and information to patients (eg, providing instructions at discharge or explaining test results or the cause of a patients symptoms), (3) wait times, and (4) perceived standards of care. 4,5 Other studies have had similar findings 6,7 and have added factors related to the environment of the ED (eg, cleanliness, privacy). 8,9 King et al recently linked overcrowding in the ED to lower patient satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Of course, this situation negatively impacts both the internal user (health personnel) and the external user’s (the patient) perception of satisfaction [ 39 ]; in addition to hindering the normal flow in clinical care, which is less fluid and develops a tendency to less protection of privacy in care. Finally, sometimes these shortcomings cause a delay in the care and/or the resolution of the cases, directly affecting the health of people who must tolerate the suffering of their ailments without an early clinical solution, some palliative measure, or a worsening of their symptoms during the waiting time.…”
Section: Description Of the Attention Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waiting times have been shown to be a major cause for patient satisfaction in multiple clinical studies [5][6][7][8]. The reported correlation between waiting time and patients' satisfaction directly influences the perceived quality of healthcare [9]. Quality management without waiting time optimisation is therefore inconceivable.…”
Section: Key Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%