Predictors of participation in atrial fibrillation screening among community residents in China

Gu, Haiyue; Huang, Jun; Qiao, Shuqian; Chen, Xinyi; Cao, Xi

doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2023.04.015

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3,4 In recent years, community arrhythmia screening programs have been widely performed in Chinese primary medical institutions, including ECG, ambulatory monitoring, and smartphone-based technologies. 5 The effectiveness of these methods in detecting arrhythmias varies, and considerations such as the cost, accessibility, and scalability should be considered when selecting a screening approach. Despite this, most medical institutions still choose ECG and Holter tests as the primary tools for arrhythmia screening.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The diagnostic efficiency of artificial intelligence based 2 hours Holter monitoring in premature ventricular and supraventricular contractions detection

Huang,

Fan,

Wang

et al. 2024

Clinical Cardiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundElectrocardiography (ECG) and 24 hours Holter monitoring (24 h‐Holter) provided valuable information for premature ventricular and supraventricular contractions (PVC and PSVC). Currently, artificial intelligence (AI) based 2 hours single‐lead Holter (2 h‐Holter) monitoring may provide an improved strategy for PSVC/PVC diagnosis.HypothesisAI combined with single‐lead Holter monitoring improves PSVC/PVC detection.MethodsIn total, 170 patients were enrolled between August 2022 and 2023. All patients wore both devices simultaneously; then, we compared diagnostic efficiency, including the sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive‐value (PPV) and negative predictive‐value (NPV) in detecting PSVC/PVC by 24 h‐Holter and 2 h‐Holter.ResultsThe PPV and NPV in patients underwent 2 h‐Holter were 76.00%/87.50% and 96.35%/98.55, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity were 79.17%/91.30%, and 95.65%/97.84% in PSVC/PVC detection compared with 24 h‐Holter. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) for PSVC and PVC were 0.885 and 0.741, respectively (p < .0001).ConclusionsThe potential advantages of the 2 h‐Holter were shortened wearing period, improved convenience, and excellent consistency of diagnosis.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%