Predictors of outcomes following interdisciplinary acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: Profiling psychological flexibility

Abstract

Background Growing evidence demonstrates the benefit of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for people with chronic pain. However, there remain people with chronic pain who do not benefit from ACT, and predicting treatment response is difficult. Aims This aim of this study was to investigate if baseline psychological flexibility (PF) profiles predict responses to an ACT‐based pain management programme. Methods Data from 415 participants attending an interdisciplinary pain management programme were included. Participants completed measures of PF processes and outcomes pre‐ and post‐treatment. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of participants based on their baseline PF scores. ANOVAs were conducted to compare subgroups of participants on outcome variables at baseline, and changes from pre‐ to post‐treatment. Results Three subgroups of participants were identified: (a) low PF, (b) low openness and (c) high awareness and action. The three subgroups significantly differed on all outcome measures at pre‐treatment, supporting the clinical relevance of these PF profiles. However, participants with different baseline PF profiles did not appear to differ in terms of changes in outcome variables. Conclusions People with chronic pain demonstrate different PF profiles, but appear to respond to ACT similarly regardless of these profiles. Future studies with a more individualized focus are needed to further understand which components of ACT work for whom on which outcome and how. Significance There remain people with chronic pain who do not benefit from acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and predicting treatment response is difficult. This is the first study to identify psychological flexibility (PF) profiles along multiple PF processes using latent class analysis, and the first longitudinal study to investigate PF profiles in relation to outcomes in ACT for chronic pain. The findings contribute to the understanding of theoretically consistent predictors of outcomes in ACT, which in turn can inform treatment development.

Personalized pain management: Is it time for process‐based therapy for particular people with chronic pain?

“…Similar results are achieved in other cohorts and from other forms of psychological-based or interdisciplinary treatment (e.g. Moen et al, 2022;Yu et al, 2017;Yu et al, 2022).…”

Endorsing a Biopsychosocial Perspective of Pain in Individuals With Chronic Pain

“…This indicated that patients who endorsed the biopsychosocial perspective of pain scored high on a measure of anxiety and depression. With related concepts, such as pain beliefs, the acceptance of a less simple solution for chronic pain, 18 or pain acceptance, 45,46 anxiety, or depression were negatively related in previous studies. This is contradictory to our findings.…”

An Observational Study of Outcomes Associated with Virtual Pain Management Programmes Based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Implemented During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Further understanding of predictors of treatment outcomes by delivery format may enhance our ability to match patients with the most suitable treatment format. To date, research on cognitive-behavioral pain management approaches, including ACT, has struggled to identify consistent predictors of treatment outcomes 14,60,61 . The reliance on aggregate group-level data may contribute to the difficulty in identifying predictors, as treatment response is likely to be highly individual.…”

“…To address varying levels of patient need and complexity, different formats and intensities of ACT-based PMPs have been implemented within the UK’s National Health Service 13 . For example, an intensive residential ACT-based PMP has been running for more than 12 years for patients presenting with severe and complex pain-related disability or distress 14,15 . A less intensive outpatient format is also offered for people presenting with less pervasive impacts of pain on their lives 16 .…”