2014
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of outcomes following catheter‐based therapy for acute stroke

Abstract: Successful revascularization with CBT leads to a good neurologic outcome in selected stroke patients. Medical co-morbidities and increased age > 65 years contributed to poor outcomes. To support broadening the number of physicians qualified to perform catheter-based stroke interventions, this study demonstrates that IC participating on a stroke team achieve comparable outcomes to NI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We excluded patients if key demographic data was unavailable (age or sex); if the target lesion location was unknown (LVO vs non‐LVO); if baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was not available or key post‐procedural outcome data was unavailable (specifically; mortality and modified Rankin score [mRS]). Data included in this study from individual hospitals has been in part, been previously published 13‐15 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We excluded patients if key demographic data was unavailable (age or sex); if the target lesion location was unknown (LVO vs non‐LVO); if baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was not available or key post‐procedural outcome data was unavailable (specifically; mortality and modified Rankin score [mRS]). Data included in this study from individual hospitals has been in part, been previously published 13‐15 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients under- Data included in this study from individual hospitals has been in part, been previously published. [13][14][15]…”
Section: Patient Population and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several reports demonstrating the feasibility of offering safe and effective first medical contact stroke therapy by stroke teams consisting of carotid stent-capable interventional cardiologists and non-invasive neurologists ( Table 2). [26][27][28][29] Htyte et al 26 compared outcomes of interventional cardiologists versus neurointerventionalists in 124 consecutive acute stroke patients who received MT between 2006 and 2012. 26 The on-call interventional team (interventional cardiologists versus neurointerventionalists) rotated responsibility for stroke calls.…”
Section: Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28][29] Htyte et al 26 compared outcomes of interventional cardiologists versus neurointerventionalists in 124 consecutive acute stroke patients who received MT between 2006 and 2012. 26 The on-call interventional team (interventional cardiologists versus neurointerventionalists) rotated responsibility for stroke calls. The interventional cardiologists had extensive carotid stenting experience and teamed with a non-invasive stroke neurologist who was responsible for pre-and post-management decisions.…”
Section: Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%