2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of outcome after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke in patients aged ≥90 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, the age of patients in our study was relatively young compared with some other studies (23,24). Sojka et al reported that the mortality after 90 days was as high as 47.4 % in acute ischemic stroke patients aged more than 90 years old (25). The baseline pcASPECTS and NIHSS scores represent the severity of stroke in patients, which in turn determines the prognosis of patients to a large extent, and this is confirmed by this study and previous investigations (12,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In practice, the age of patients in our study was relatively young compared with some other studies (23,24). Sojka et al reported that the mortality after 90 days was as high as 47.4 % in acute ischemic stroke patients aged more than 90 years old (25). The baseline pcASPECTS and NIHSS scores represent the severity of stroke in patients, which in turn determines the prognosis of patients to a large extent, and this is confirmed by this study and previous investigations (12,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Tziomalos et al (2017) reported that stress hyperglycemia was not an independent predictor of poor outcome but was rather associated with a more severe stroke (admission NIHSS). In regard to NIHSS score, early neurological change or the change of NIHSS score, rather than baseline score, was significantly and independently associated with 90-day outcomes (Heitsch et al, 2021. While, some studies found that a lower baseline score was associated with a favorable outcome (Sojka et al, 2021) and the performance of NIHSS score in predicting functional outcome was time-dependent (Wu et al, 2019). Therefore, the prognostic prediction power of glucose levels and baseline NIHSS score remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the MT group, successful reperfusion (ie, modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia score of 2b or 3) was achieved in 82 (80%), and incomplete reperfusion in 20 (20%) cases. Compared with the BMT group, the MT group had: higher NIHSS on admission (12 [IQR,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) versus 10 [5-18], P=0.22), shorter times from admission to imaging (min; 25 [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] versus 32 , P=0.01) and from admission to bolus (in the case of pretreatment with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator; 45 versus 59 [49-95], P=0.04), more often proximal LVO (M1 occlusion: 53% versus 40%, P=0.10), larger hypoperfusion volume (81 mL [IQR, 52-127] versus 52 mL [IQR, , P=0.01), and larger core-to-perfusion mismatch volume (69 mL [IQR, 43-100] versus 29 mL [IQR, 14-55], P≤0.001). All baseline characteristics are reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Baseline Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score to assess the primary and secondary end points, controlling for confounding factors described in the literature as influencing functional outcome (see text section S2). 3,4,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31] These variables are: age, hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, occlusion site, NIHSS score at admission, premorbid mRS score, intravenous thrombolysis, time from onset to admission, blood glucose level at admission, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, ischemic core volume, and hypoperfusion lesion volume. In contrast to propensity score matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting does not lead to sample size loss, and yields valid results even with small sample sizes.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%