Predictors of Outcome after Direct Aspiration of Basilar Artery Occlusion

Abstract

Background: Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a serious disease with a poor prognosis if left untreated. Endovascular therapy (EVT) is the most effective treatment that is able to reduce mortality and disability. Treatment results are influenced by a wide range of factors that have not been clearly identified. In the present study, direct aspiration was chosen as a first-line treatment. The safety and effectiveness of direct aspiration in BAO were determined, and factors affecting patient outcomes were identified. Methodology: Data for patients with BAO treated between November 2013 and December 2021 were evaluated using a database. The association between clinical and procedural parameters and functional outcome was assessed. Results: A total of 89 patients with BAO were identified. Full recanalization was achieved in 69.7% of cases and partial recanalization in 19.1%. Intracranial hemorrhage was detected in 11 (12.4%) patients, of which, eight (9.0%) patients experienced symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Patients with good outcomes presented with milder strokes (mean NIHSS score of 12.58 vs. 24.00, p < 0.001), had higher collateral scores (6.79 vs. 5.88, p = 0.016), more often achieved complete recanalization (87.9% vs. 58.9%, p = 0.009), and more often experienced early neurological improvement (66.7% vs. 26.8%, p < 0.001). On the contrary, patients with worse outcomes had higher serum glucose levels (p = 0.05), occlusion of the middle portion of the basilar artery (MAB) (30.3% vs. 53.6%, p = 0.033), longer thrombus lengths (10.51 vs. 16.48 mm, p = 0.046), and intracranial hemorrhage (p = 0.035). Conclusions: The present study results suggest that direct aspiration is a safe and effective treatment for patients with BAO. We identified several factors affecting the patients’ outcome.