2015
DOI: 10.13005/bbra/1928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Otoacoustic Emission Test in Newborns: A Prospective One Year Study in Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract: Hearing loss compromises optimal development of language and communication unless effective intervention is started within the ûrst year of life. Despite the JCIH recommendation as universal screening of all infants for hearing loss within the first few months of life; only some countries were successful in executing it. This study was undertaken in order to determine the most important predictors of Otoacoustic emission (OAE) as initial hearing screening of infancy in south of Iran. This may help in targeted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these groups had a higher failure rate than those other subgroups. Surprisingly, our data showed that those with normal birthweight had higher failure rates than those with low birthweight and those on mechanical ventilation actually passed their initial tests than those who did not require mechanical ventilation contrary to some studies (Sarafraz & Araghi, 2015). All of those neonates with craniofacial anomalies and a family history of hearing loss passed their routine initial hearing test contrary to those without a risk indicator who had a higher rate of failure like in some studies (Cone-Wesson, 2000).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Most of these groups had a higher failure rate than those other subgroups. Surprisingly, our data showed that those with normal birthweight had higher failure rates than those with low birthweight and those on mechanical ventilation actually passed their initial tests than those who did not require mechanical ventilation contrary to some studies (Sarafraz & Araghi, 2015). All of those neonates with craniofacial anomalies and a family history of hearing loss passed their routine initial hearing test contrary to those without a risk indicator who had a higher rate of failure like in some studies (Cone-Wesson, 2000).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 83%