2010
DOI: 10.1002/ana.22133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of neurologic outcome in hypothermia after cardiac arrest

Abstract: Clinical examination (brainstem reflexes, motor response, and presence of myoclonus) at Day 3 after cardiac arrest remains an accurate predictor of outcome after therapeutic hypothermia. Sedative medications in both hypothermic and nonhypothermic patients may confound the clinical exam. NSE > 33 ng/ml has a high false-positive rate in patients treated with hypothermia and should be interpreted with caution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

12
214
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
12
214
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to TTM, the “gold standard” for early prediction of neurologic outcomes was the 2006 American Academy of Neurology practice parameter, comprising 6 physical examination and diagnostic test findings on post‐arrest days 1 to 3, each with reported positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% for poor neurologic outcome 10. However, validity in the TTM population has been repeatedly questioned because of decreased individual and composite PPV 11, 12, 13. The current consensus recommendation is to delay prognosis ≥72 hours post‐arrest,14 consistent with a recent study reporting average time to awakening 3.2 days post‐arrest 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to TTM, the “gold standard” for early prediction of neurologic outcomes was the 2006 American Academy of Neurology practice parameter, comprising 6 physical examination and diagnostic test findings on post‐arrest days 1 to 3, each with reported positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% for poor neurologic outcome 10. However, validity in the TTM population has been repeatedly questioned because of decreased individual and composite PPV 11, 12, 13. The current consensus recommendation is to delay prognosis ≥72 hours post‐arrest,14 consistent with a recent study reporting average time to awakening 3.2 days post‐arrest 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians may recognize abnormalities on imaging and restrict treatments, fostering a link between those findings and poor clinical outcome. 5,6 One prognostic factor on imaging that has received recent attention is the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The optic nerve sheath is an extension of the dura and contains cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the optic nerve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. These studies have several important flaws: a lack of blinding to the results of the prognostic markers being evaluated (13,16,(19)(20)(21)(22), the high proportion of patients who have withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) (12,13,19,23), and a lack of understanding regarding the number of patients who die of a true neurologic cause defined brain death as opposed to WLST, cardiac, respiratory, infectious, or other causes. There are no adequate clinical data to prove or refute the notion that TH decreases the proportion of patients who progress to "brain death," and as such, our understanding of how TH improves mortality and neurologic outcomes remains inadequate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%