2020
DOI: 10.3233/nre-203082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of neurobehavioral symptom reporting in a community based sample with mild traumatic brain injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals who have endured mTBI, and particularly those with rmTBI, often have concomitant long-term neurological symptoms, including a decline in cognition, motor abilities and changes in behavior [81][82][83][84][85]. Extensive neuropsychological testing procedures have been established to evaluate the long-term effects, which include clinical assessments, as well as self-administered questionnaires, such as NSI-22 and PHQ-9 [86][87][88]. We conducted a secondary analysis of the psychological symptom burden in the LIMBIC CENC cohort to evaluate whether the levels of the four serum lncRNAs (VLDLR-AS1, MALAT1, NEAT1, GAS5) correlate to symptom burden (such as cognition, memory, depression or PTSD) after rmTBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals who have endured mTBI, and particularly those with rmTBI, often have concomitant long-term neurological symptoms, including a decline in cognition, motor abilities and changes in behavior [81][82][83][84][85]. Extensive neuropsychological testing procedures have been established to evaluate the long-term effects, which include clinical assessments, as well as self-administered questionnaires, such as NSI-22 and PHQ-9 [86][87][88]. We conducted a secondary analysis of the psychological symptom burden in the LIMBIC CENC cohort to evaluate whether the levels of the four serum lncRNAs (VLDLR-AS1, MALAT1, NEAT1, GAS5) correlate to symptom burden (such as cognition, memory, depression or PTSD) after rmTBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why do some individuals with an MTBI have a minimal and short-lasting set of symptoms while others may experience intractable, long-lasting and significantly disabling consequences? In a group of 80 individuals in outpatient rehabilitation treatment for symptoms associated with MTBI, Esterov et al (2020) generate a multivariate analysis linking a variety of potential predictor variables to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory that documents the ongoing symptoms the patients are experiencing and reporting. The findings support the idea that it is not the direct effects of the injury that are neces-sarily the dominant factor in the development of associated disability, but rather how the person is coping with the socially dislocating effects of the injury-for example, the impact on the ability to participate in community functions.…”
Section: Introduction To Contributed Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Despite the high incidence of concussion and possible consequences associated with these injuries, athletes underreport concussions, which may lead to delays in treatment and recovery, an increased risk of future concussions, and worse outcomes. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Increasing youth awareness, knowledge, and reporting norms can promote prevention, enhance recovery, and benefit public health. 9,11,12 Researchers [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] have evaluated the efficacy of available concussion-education materials using the theory of planned behavior (TPB).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%