2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-1003-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of narrow angle detection rate—a longitudinal study of Massachusetts residents over 1.7 million person years

Abstract: Background/Objectives To determine the predictors of narrow angle detection in a United States population-based cohort. Materials and methods This was a retrospective cohort study using the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database. Demographic information of all patients and eye care provider information during the years 2011–2015 were extracted from Massachusetts All Payers Claims Data. All payers who received eye care during 1/1/2012–12/31/2015 wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both optometrists and ophthalmologists are critical in the delivery of eye care in the US, although their training requirements vary, and the impact of expanded access on quality of care and other outcomes should be investigated in future studies. Given concerns about quality of care per previous literature and the lack of evidence for improved access to care in our study, careful consideration should be given before supporting additional scope of practice expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both optometrists and ophthalmologists are critical in the delivery of eye care in the US, although their training requirements vary, and the impact of expanded access on quality of care and other outcomes should be investigated in future studies. Given concerns about quality of care per previous literature and the lack of evidence for improved access to care in our study, careful consideration should be given before supporting additional scope of practice expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%