Predictors of Mental Health and School-Related Outcomes in First Year University Students: Identifying Prevention Targets

Duffy, Anne; Keown‐Stoneman, Charles; Goodday, Sarah M.; Horrocks, Julie; Lowe, Matthew; King, Nathan; Pickett, William; McNevin, Steven H.; Cunningham, Simone; Rivera, Daniel E.; Bisdounis, Lampros; Bowie, Christopher R.; Harkness, Kate L.; Saunders, Kate

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3543616

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Participant demographics are shown in table 1. Prior papers have assessed the degree to which the samples at both Time 1 and 2 represent the entire eligible cohort 44 45. In summary, the respondents at time 1 were mainly similar to the eligible pool of first years.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The U-Flourish study protocol and methods have been published in detail elsewhere. [43][44][45] Briefly, the survey explored factors previously associated with academic performance and mental health in student populations. The time 1 survey was launched 2 weeks into the first term of 2018, and the time 2 survey was launched in March 2019, 2 weeks prior to the start of the final examination period.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mental health trajectories in undergraduate students over the first year of university: a longitudinal cohort study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThis study examined the association between candidate psychosocial and lifestyle variables and the trajectories of clinically significant anxiety and depressive symptoms from entry to completion of first-year university.DesignA longitudinal cohort studyParticipantsFirst-year undergraduate studentsMethodsWe analysed the responses of 1686 first-year undergraduate students attending Queen’s University who completed electronic surveys at both the beginning and completion of their academic year. Predictors of change in positive anxiety and depressive symptom screens (based on exceeding validated symptom threshold scores) were identified using logistic regression.ResultsIncreased university connectedness reduced the odds of emergent significant depressive and anxiety symptoms in healthy students and increased the odds of recovery in students who screened positive at the start of university. Students who screened positive for depression or anxiety at university entry were less likely to recover if they had a lifetime history of internalising disorders. Healthy students who increased their drug use over their first year had higher odds of developing significant levels of both anxiety and depressive symptoms by completion of the academic year.ConclusionsModerate to severe levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms are common among students at entry to university and persist over the first year. University connectedness may mitigate the risk of persistent or emergent symptoms, whereas drug use appears to increase these risks. Findings have implications for university well-being initiatives.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%