Predictors of long-term symptom burden and quality of life in patients hospitalised with chest pain: a prospective observational study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo describe the magnitude and predictors of symptom burden (SB) and quality of life (QoL) 3 months after hospital admission for acute chest pain.DesignProspective observational study.SettingSingle centre, outpatient follow-up.Participants1506 patients.OutcomesScores reported for general health (RAND-12), angina-related health (Seattle Angina Questionnaire 7 (SAQ-7)) and dyspnoea (Rose Dyspnea Scale) 3 months after hospital admission for chest pain.MethodsA total of 1506 patients received questionnaires assessing general health (RAND-12), angina-related health (SAQ-7) and dyspnoea (Rose Dyspnea Scale) 3 months after discharge. Univariable and multivariable regression models identified predictors of SB and QoL scores. A mediator analysis identified factors mediating the effect of an unstable angina pectoris (UAP) diagnosis.Results774 (52%) responded. Discharge diagnoses were non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (14.2%), UAP (17.1%), non-coronary cardiac disease (6.6%), non-cardiac disease (6.3%) and non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) (55.6%). NSTEMI had the most favourable, and UAP patients the least favourable SAQ-7 scores (median SAQ7-summary; 88 vs 75, p<0.001). NCCP patients reported persisting chest pain in 50% and dyspnoea in 33% of cases. After adjusting for confounders, revascularisation predicted better QoL scores, while UAP, current smoking and hypertension predicted worse outcome. NSTEMI and UAP patients who were revascularised reported higher scores (p<0.05) in SAQ-7-QL, SAQ7-PL, SAQ7-summary (NSTEMI) and all SAQ-7 domains (UAP). Revascularisation altered the unstandardised beta value (>±10%) of an UAP diagnosis for all SAQ-7 and RAND-12 outcomes.ConclusionsPatients with NSTEMI reported the most favourable outcome 3 months after hospitalisation for chest pain. Patients with other diseases, in particular UAP patients, reported lower scores. Revascularised NSTEMI and UAP patients reported higher QoL scores compared with patients receiving conservative treatment. Revascularisation mediated all outcomes in UAP patients.Trial registration numberNCT02620202.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Not Superior to Optimal Medical Therapy in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis

“…These results are supported by the contemporary surgical results that showed no long-term clinical events benefit compared with OMT in patients with CCS [ 55 ]. Certainly, these results do not apply to acute coronary syndrome or patients with unstable angina [ 56 , 57 ], in whom the pathophysiology of symptoms and clinical presentation is quite different.…”

Quality of Life in Patients With Unstable Angina Before and After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Single-Center Pilot Study Using the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire

“…UA shows lower early mortality, but the long-term prognosis for these conditions is worse than for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The patients tend to be older, have more extensive coronary artery disease, and have more co-morbidities [ 1 - 3 ]. Patients with UA have a higher frequency of chest pain, dyspnea, and a lower quality of life than those with NSTEMI [ 3 ].…”

“…The patients tend to be older, have more extensive coronary artery disease, and have more co-morbidities [ 1 - 3 ]. Patients with UA have a higher frequency of chest pain, dyspnea, and a lower quality of life than those with NSTEMI [ 3 ].…”