2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of locoregional control in stage I/II oral squamous cell carcinoma classified by AJCC 8th edition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, an increase in the depth of invasion probably precedes and influences perineural and perivascular invasions. In addition, perineural invasion and WHO grading system could be included in TNM classification for a more complete variable, because these are the most predictable variables, as suggested by Subramaniam, et al 25 (2019), using the new edition of TNM, and also our study, using the 7 th edition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, an increase in the depth of invasion probably precedes and influences perineural and perivascular invasions. In addition, perineural invasion and WHO grading system could be included in TNM classification for a more complete variable, because these are the most predictable variables, as suggested by Subramaniam, et al 25 (2019), using the new edition of TNM, and also our study, using the 7 th edition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In early (stage I/II) cancers, up to a third of adequately treated patients can develop locoregional recurrences, which have been noted to have a strong correlation with adverse pathological features like perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and degree of differentiation, which have so far not been incorporated into the staging system. 5 In advanced (stage III/IV) cancers prognostication based on tumor dimension with/without nodal spread alone also seems inadequate. This forms a highly heterogeneous group of patients in whom prediction of survival solely based on stage is unreliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition TNM staging systems for oral cancer 4 has shown improved performance when compared with previous systems, this classification, however, still remains largely insufficient. In early (stage I/II) cancers, up to a third of adequately treated patients can develop locoregional recurrences, which have been noted to have a strong correlation with adverse pathological features like perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and degree of differentiation, which have so far not been incorporated into the staging system 5 . In advanced (stage III/IV) cancers prognostication based on tumor dimension with/without nodal spread alone also seems inadequate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is a robust staging system, factors that upstage tumors like tumor dimension and masticator space involvement can vary significantly with the anatomical location of the tumor and adjacent barriers to tumor spread. Moreover, incorporation of adverse features that are likely to reflect tumor biology has been previously shown by our group to improve precision in staging of early oral cancers 2,9 . However, the hazard discrimination in advanced tumors (pT3‐4) in our cohort remained poor (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%