2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.02.226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of limb loss despite a patent endovascular-treated arterial segment

Abstract: Amputation despite PETAS is the most common means of limb loss in patients undergoing endovascular revascularization for limb salvage. It is likely the result of aggressive attempts at limb salvage and usually occurs Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
52
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The long-term outcomes of the current report confirm previous short-term results that the peroneal artery is equivalent to single-vessel tibial runoff in a patent an endovascularly treated arterial segment. 30 Furthermore, the long-term LS presented here is similar to the 68% to 93% LS rates for open peroneal artery bypass reported in the literature. [31][32][33] This study is a single-center, retrospective analysis and is therefore limited by the potential for referral and selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The long-term outcomes of the current report confirm previous short-term results that the peroneal artery is equivalent to single-vessel tibial runoff in a patent an endovascularly treated arterial segment. 30 Furthermore, the long-term LS presented here is similar to the 68% to 93% LS rates for open peroneal artery bypass reported in the literature. [31][32][33] This study is a single-center, retrospective analysis and is therefore limited by the potential for referral and selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results of this study were generally in agreement with those of previous reports. [23][24][25][26] TASC II recommends that factors that can negatively affect wound healing, such as cardiac failure or poor nutritional status, should be evaluated and treated appropriately.…”
Section: Discussion What Difference Does This Study Make?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 A high incidence of infrapopliteal lesions, 32 neurological disorders, increased susceptibility to infection, lower limb deformity, and renal impairment are considered contributing factors in patients with diabetes. 33,34 In fact, even when a venous graft remains patent, the risk of lower limb amputation is reported to be high in patients with diabetes.…”
Section: Discussion What Difference Does This Study Make?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore diabetes is a determinant of poor outcome after revascularisation for critical lower limb ischaemia (CLI) [3]. It is associated with a significant number of postoperative systemic and lower limb adverse events [4], and, quite commonly, major limb amputation is required in diabetic patients despite a patent bypass graft [5] or patent endovascularly treated artery [6]. Estimation of the risk of adverse outcome in this high-risk patient population would enable clinicians to better understand the determinants of an unfavourable course of events after lower limb revascularisation, to direct resources to those patients with a potentially favourable outcome, and to focus research on those with poor prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%