2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of in-hospital mortality and midterm outcomes of patients successfully weaned from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies examining negative predictors of outcome in weaned patients mostly refer to selected VA-ECMO indications. For cardiogenic shock, the following attributes have been identified as independent risk factors of mortality after weaning: advanced age, previous myocardial infarction, diabetes, renal failure with requirement for continuous renal replacement therapy, high serum butyrylcholinesterase, high serum lactate, low mean arterial pressure (MAP), unsuccessful revascularization in the setting of acute myocardial infarction, prolonged VA-ECMO support, hypoxemia at VA-ECMO weaning, low Glasgow Coma Score, and high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [20,23,[26][27][28][29]. Additionally, Chommeloux et al recently showed that inability to rapidly restore microcirculation during the first 24 h, which is severely impaired in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock, is associated with death on VA-ECMO [30].…”
Section: Cardiogenic Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies examining negative predictors of outcome in weaned patients mostly refer to selected VA-ECMO indications. For cardiogenic shock, the following attributes have been identified as independent risk factors of mortality after weaning: advanced age, previous myocardial infarction, diabetes, renal failure with requirement for continuous renal replacement therapy, high serum butyrylcholinesterase, high serum lactate, low mean arterial pressure (MAP), unsuccessful revascularization in the setting of acute myocardial infarction, prolonged VA-ECMO support, hypoxemia at VA-ECMO weaning, low Glasgow Coma Score, and high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [20,23,[26][27][28][29]. Additionally, Chommeloux et al recently showed that inability to rapidly restore microcirculation during the first 24 h, which is severely impaired in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock, is associated with death on VA-ECMO [30].…”
Section: Cardiogenic Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been described that older age, higher body mass index, coronary artery disease, elevated total bilirubin were promoted for patients receiving ECMO (17,18). Moreover, myocardial infarction, diabetes, prolonged ECMO support, and pulmonary dysfunction were also reported strongly predicted in-hospital mortality after ECMO weaning (19). In our research, we found high levels of age, coronary heart disease, multiple organ failure, bleeding complications, anemia, DBIL, LDH, APTT, and ECMO duration time are strongly associated with worse in-hospital survival of ECMO treated patients, and these clinical markers could as independent predictors for patient in-hospital mortality, hence it would further support previous ndings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Over the recent decades since the widespread utilization of V-A ECMO, multiple weaning strategies exist, of which decremental pump ow reduction and arteriovenous bridging recirculation technique are the mainstream approaches [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] . Nevertheless, variations in practice exist among institutions, and there are no consensus guidelines to standardize the weaning algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of knowledge, decremental ow reduction and arteriovenous bridging recirculation remain the commonest adopted strategies to trial a patient off V-A ECMO [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] . Nevertheless, limitations of these strategies include variability in circuit arrangement between institutions, and risk of thromboembolic events during clamping of the circuit 11,12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%