2019
DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of in‐hospital cardiac arrest within 24 h after emergency department triage: A case–control study in urban Thailand

Abstract: Objective This study describes the predictors of in‐hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) within 24 h of ED triage and evaluates their ability to predict patients at risk of IHCA. Methods A case–control study was conducted in the ED. ‘Cases’ are herein defined as hospitalised patients who experienced IHCA within 24 h after ED triage. The exclusion criteria were those younger than 16 years old, cases of traumatic arrest, or had do‐not‐resuscitate orders. The controls were adults, non‐traumatic cases, who did not exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to gender, the results showed that attendance a BLS course previously had signi cant effect on knowledge level. Similar results were reported from Oman, [13] United Kingdom, [18] Pakistan [15] and Thailand [19]. In this study, the numbers of participants who received training in BLS and had knowledge of CPR (massage rate, massage location, massage depth and massage/ventilation rate) were higher than those who did not receive training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to gender, the results showed that attendance a BLS course previously had signi cant effect on knowledge level. Similar results were reported from Oman, [13] United Kingdom, [18] Pakistan [15] and Thailand [19]. In this study, the numbers of participants who received training in BLS and had knowledge of CPR (massage rate, massage location, massage depth and massage/ventilation rate) were higher than those who did not receive training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[23] The knowledge of BLS may decrease in the 6 months following the training as seen in Winchana et al study. [19] Therefore, students should constantly review BLS principles continually and keep up to date with the latest guidelines. Regarding universities ranking, the results showed that universities in Jordan achieved the rst six ranks, while there is only one Syrian university among the top 10 universities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies used MTS priority as modeling predictor along with other variables collected at triage, namely for prediction of hospital admissions [39][40][41] and mortality [26,53]. In [39], a logistic regression and an artificial neural network model both yielded an AUROC of 0.86…”
Section: Prior Work In Machine Learning For Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results for both independent predictors of death within 30 days were: door-toteam times OR of 1.13 (95% CI 1.07-1.18) and team-to-ward times OR of 1.07 (95% CI 1.02-1.13). In [53] a logistic regression model yielded an AUROC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.93) from information of MTS priority at presentation, age, gender, comorbidities, functional status at presentation, mode of arrival, time of ED visit, type of specialty, physiological parameters at different times, level of consciousness, need for supplement oxygen, need for ventilation assistance, use of vasoactive and inotropic agents and initial laboratory markers in the ED. Other studies were performed for mortality prediction, where MTS priority was not used as modeling predictor.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early detection and intervention of disease deterioration are the keys to reducing the incidence of preventable in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) [1]. Vital signs have been shown to be accurate predictors of clinical deterioration [2][3][4][5][6]. However, the usefulness of vital signs is affected by the quality of the process of measurement [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%