Predictors of HPV vaccine uptake among women aged 19–26: Importance of a physician's recommendation

Rosenthal, Susan L.; Weiß, Thomas; Zimet, Gregory D.; Ma, Lei; Good, Margaret B.; Vichnin, Michelle

doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.063

Cited by 404 publications

(305 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

274

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It has been noted that although CC is a preventable disease, in many developing countries screening program is lack and nurses generally play a major role in health education and prevention. The earlier studies also stated that participants were more likely to agree to HPV vaccination when recommended by their health care providers (Yanikkerem et al, 2010;Rosenthal et al, 2011).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices and Barriers Towards HPV Vaccination among Nurses in Turkey: a Longitudinal Study

Yanıkkerem

Koker²

2014

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices and Barriers Towards HPV Vaccination among Nurses in Turkey: a Longitudinal Study

Yanıkkerem

Koker²

2014

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Providers who were more knowledgeable about HPV related cancers were also more likely to provide a strong recommendation for the vaccine. As provider recommendation is one of the strongest predictors of HPV vaccine uptake (11)(12)(13)(14), future research should be conducted to determine effective interventions to increase physician knowledge about cancer-prevention indications for HPV vaccination.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While some variation exists between the factors associated with male and female vaccine uptake, health care provider recommendation is a primary factor for HPV vaccination of both males and females (11,12). However, many of the studies of males were conducted prior to implementation of the ACIP routine recommendation (13)(14)(15).…”

Section: Most Published Research On Factors Associated With Hpv Vaccimentioning

confidence: 99%

A model of health care provider decision making about HPV vaccination in adolescent males

Alexander

Best

Stupiansky

et al. 2015

Vaccine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: In the U.S. HPV vaccination of adolescent males remains low, despite the recommendation for routine vaccination. Although research has highlighted that health care provider (HCP) recommendation is very influential in HPV vaccine uptake, research on this topic in the male population is lacking. Accordingly, we used a qualitative approach to identify HCP knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding adolescent male HPV vaccination, one year after routine vaccination of adolescent males was recommended. Method: Twenty U.S. pediatric HCPs participated in 20-30 minute interviews about knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding male HPV vaccination. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed and analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results: The providers had been in practice for 1-35 years, 75% were female, and 75% were White. Opinions on HPV vaccination were shaped by knowledge/perception of the risks and benefits of vaccination. Although all providers frequently offered HPV vaccine to male patients, the strength and content of the offer varied greatly.Vaccination opinions determined what issues were emphasized in the vaccine offer (e.g., stressing herd immunity, discussing prevention of genital warts), while adolescent age influenced if and how they pitched their vaccine offer (e.g., HPV as an STI). Most providers agreed with the ACIP recommendations, however, several expressed that providers' pre-existing opinions might remain unchanged despite the recommendations. Consistent with the literature on determinants of HPV vaccination, providers believed that their own recommendation was a major factor in a family's decision to vaccinate. Barriers to vaccination included the "newness" and sexual nature of the vaccine, lack of insurance coverage and the vaccine not being mandated. Conclusions: Providers' opinions about, and approaches to offering, HPV vaccination to males were highly variable. Interventions designed to improve male HPV vaccination 3 should focus on helping providers to routinely recommend the vaccine to all of their eligible patients, both males and females.

show abstract

“…First, with regard to recommendation strength, quantitative studies consistently found an association between the extent to which providers endorsed the importance of HPV vaccine and parents' positive perceptions of HPV vaccine, 60,86 their intention to get their children vaccinated, 60,87 and adolescents' receipt of HPV vaccine. 60,[87][88][89] Qualitative studies also found strong provider endorsement to be uniquely influential on parents' HPV vaccination decisions. 27,38,74,77 Unfortunately, these same studies suggested that providers often failed to strongly endorse HPV vaccine.…”

Section: Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…27,38,74,77 Unfortunately, these same studies suggested that providers often failed to strongly endorse HPV vaccine. 11,27,38,44,47,60,86,87,89,90 For example, one national study found that only about two-thirds of parents who received HPV vaccine recommendations perceived a high level of provider endorsement. 60 Building on the notion of recommendation strength, a second series of studies found that recommendation quality, or the extent to which providers delivered guideline-consistent 75 Cross-sectional, mail and fax survey recommendations, was also associated with HPV vaccination.…”

Section: Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Provider communication about HPV vaccination: A systematic review

Gilkey

McRee

2016

Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

248

220

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Improving HPV vaccination coverage in the US will require healthcare providers to recommend the vaccine more effectively. To inform quality improvement efforts, we systematically reviewed studies of provider communication about HPV vaccination. Methods. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and POPLINE in August 2015 to identify studies of provider communication about HPV vaccination. Results. We identified 101 qualitative and quantitative studies. Providers less often recommended HPV vaccine if they were uncomfortable discussing sex, perceived parents as hesitant, or believed patients to be low risk. Patients less often received recommendations if they were younger, male, or from racial/ethnic minorities. Despite parents' preference for unambiguous recommendations, providers often sent mixed messages by failing to endorse HPV vaccine strongly, differentiating it from other vaccines, and presenting it as an "optional" vaccine that could be delayed. Conclusion. Interventions are needed to help providers deliver effective recommendations in the complex communication environment surrounding HPV vaccination.

show abstract

Predictors of HPV vaccine uptake among women aged 19–26: Importance of a physician's recommendation

Cited by 404 publications

References 43 publications

Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices and Barriers Towards HPV Vaccination among Nurses in Turkey: a Longitudinal Study

Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices and Barriers Towards HPV Vaccination among Nurses in Turkey: a Longitudinal Study

A model of health care provider decision making about HPV vaccination in adolescent males

Provider communication about HPV vaccination: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About