OBJECTIVE -The purpose of this study is to evaluate two updated measures of diabetes regimen adherence. The Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) is a widely used, structured interview. Limitations include a substantial interviewer and respondent time burden and the need for well-trained interviewers to use appropriate prompts and score the open-ended responses. The Diabetes Behavior Rating Scale (DBRS) is a self-administered, fixed-choice survey.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -Both measures were administered to 146 youth with type 1 diabetes (aged 11-18 years) and their parents. Items were added to the DBRS to allow for both flexible and conventional regimens, and the DSMP was modified to use standardized wording across items, accommodate flexible regimens, and permit administration by nonmedical interviewers.RESULTS -Both measures had good evidence of internal consistency (for the DSMP: parent 0.75 and youth 0.70; for the DBRS: parent 0.84 and youth 0.84). Scores on the DSMP and the DBRS were significantly related (r ϭ 0.72 for parents and 0.74 for youth). There was moderate agreement between parent and youth (DSMP, r ϭ 0.51; DBRS, r ϭ 0.48). The measures were correlated with HbA 1c for both parent (DSMP, r ϭ Ϫ0.35; DBRS, r ϭ Ϫ0.35) and youth (DSMP, r ϭ Ϫ0.36; DBRS, r ϭ Ϫ0.34) reports.CONCLUSIONS -Both measures exhibit good psychometric properties and good criterion validity but varied in terms of respondent and interviewer burden, issues that should be considered in selecting assessment procedures.
Diabetes Care 29:2263-2267, 2006L ong-term complications of insulindependent diabetes (type 1 diabetes) include higher morbidity and mortality from retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease (1-4). There may be no minimum glycemic threshold for the reduction of longterm complications; long-term risk continues to decrease with HbA 1c (A1C) Ͻ8% accompanied by a lessgradual increase in the risk of hypoglycemia (5). Successful management of type 1 diabetes has been shown to reduce the frequency and severity of these long-term consequences; however, although intensive therapy may improve glycemic control, few families are able to maintain metabolic control within the recommended guidelines (1-6), and control appears to decrease during the adolescent years (7-12). To reduce potential longterm health effects, Cefalu (13) argues for lowering the pediatric glycemic goal Ͻ8% but recognizes that until we can improve diabetes management during adolescence, such a goal is meaningless.Diabetes self-management includes a variety of skills that must be performed daily: monitoring blood glucose, administering insulin, regulating diet and physical activity, and calculating appropriate care based on the results of these activities (14,15). In addition, the process requires adaptation to changing adolescent physiology and shifting parent and youth responsibilities while recognizing that the goals of diabetes management may be changing at the same time (15). Reliable and valid measures of adherence are essential fo...