2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of free flap loss in the head and neck region: A four-year retrospective study with 451 microvascular transplants at a single centre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
35
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Microvascular free‐flap transfer has become a standard procedure for complex defect coverage and reconstruction after head and neck cancer resection. Surgical techniques have undergone many developments that have made free‐flap reconstruction a safe and effective procedure, with a success rate of 91–99% (Bui et al, ; Mucke et al, ; Offodile 2nd, Aherrera, Wenger, Rajab, & Guo, ). However, due to the complex nature and long operative time of the procedure, as well as the underlying medical issues in these patients, the patients are subjected to the development of surgical complications, such as infection, hematoma, wound disruption, fistula, pedicle thrombosis, partial flap gangrene, and total flap loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microvascular free‐flap transfer has become a standard procedure for complex defect coverage and reconstruction after head and neck cancer resection. Surgical techniques have undergone many developments that have made free‐flap reconstruction a safe and effective procedure, with a success rate of 91–99% (Bui et al, ; Mucke et al, ; Offodile 2nd, Aherrera, Wenger, Rajab, & Guo, ). However, due to the complex nature and long operative time of the procedure, as well as the underlying medical issues in these patients, the patients are subjected to the development of surgical complications, such as infection, hematoma, wound disruption, fistula, pedicle thrombosis, partial flap gangrene, and total flap loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its introduction, microvascular technology and technique have undergone developments that have made free flap repairs safe and effective, with a success rate of 91% to 99%. [1][2][3] However, patients are still subject to postoperative complications that result from the complex nature of the procedure, long operative course, and suboptimal preoperative health status. These complications may contribute to the rare flap failure, which is associated with substantial morbidity and significant cost to the patient and health care system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The necessity for bone flap monitoring becomes clear in light of the success rates of bone flaps (90.8%) in comparison with soft-tissue flaps (anterolateral thigh flap 97% and radial forearm flap 97.2%). 12 Because of the limited supply of donor bone, losing a bone flap is all the more disadvantageous. But even losing a single fibula segment jeopardizes the entire functional outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 This decreased blood flow might also explain the considerably higher failure rate of FFF as compared with that of soft-tissue flaps. 12 In light of these considerations, intraoperative and postoperative monitoring of fibula flaps becomes all the more important. However, adequate tools for intraoperative assessment of bone perfusion are scarce.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%