2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of chemoradiotherapy versus single modality therapy and overall survival among patients with unresectable, stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract: Introduction Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) was the standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prior to the PACIFIC trial, however, patients also received single modality therapy. This study identified predictors of therapy and differences in overall survival (OS). Methods This retrospective study included stage III NSCLC patients aged �65 years, with �1 claim for systemic therapy (ST) or radiotherapy (RT) within 90 days of diagnosis, identified in SEER-Me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A retrospective study with 3799 stage III NSCLC patients analyzed prediction factors associated with the receipt of cCRT. Seeing three types of specialists (medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, and surgeon) prior to the initiation of treatment increased the odds of receiving cCRT compared to seeing only one type of specialist (logistic regression OR 1.87; p < 0.001) [61]. A single-center study evaluated the effectiveness of an MDT approach on the outcomes of 109 patients.…”
Section: Impact Of Mdts On Ccrtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective study with 3799 stage III NSCLC patients analyzed prediction factors associated with the receipt of cCRT. Seeing three types of specialists (medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, and surgeon) prior to the initiation of treatment increased the odds of receiving cCRT compared to seeing only one type of specialist (logistic regression OR 1.87; p < 0.001) [61]. A single-center study evaluated the effectiveness of an MDT approach on the outcomes of 109 patients.…”
Section: Impact Of Mdts On Ccrtmentioning
confidence: 99%