Predictors of caregiver burden across the home-based palliative care trajectory in Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Family caregivers of patients enrolled in home-based palliative care programmes provide unpaid care and assistance with daily activities to terminally ill family members. Caregivers often experience caregiver burden, which is an important predictor of anxiety and depression that can extend into bereavement. We conducted a longitudinal, prospective cohort study to comprehensively assess modifiable and non-modifiable patient and caregiver factors that account for caregiver burden over the palliative care trajectory. Caregivers (n = 327) of patients with malignant neoplasm were recruited from two dedicated home-based palliative care programmes in Southern Ontario, Canada from 1 July 2010 to 31 August 2012. Data were obtained from bi-weekly telephone interviews with caregivers from study admission until death, and from palliative care programme and home-care agency databases. Information collected comprised patient and caregiver demographics, utilisation of privately and publicly financed resources, patient clinical status and caregiver burden. The average age of the caregivers was 59.0 years (SD: 13.2), and almost 70% were female. Caregiver burden increased over time in a non-linear fashion from study admission to patient death. Increased monthly unpaid care-giving time costs, monthly public personal support worker costs, emergency department visits and low patient functional status were associated with higher caregiver burden. Greater use of hospice care was associated with lower burden. Female caregivers tended to report more burden compared to men as death approached, and burden was higher when patients were male. Low patient functional status was the strongest predictor of burden. Understanding the influence of modifiable and non-modifiable factors on the experience of burden over the palliative trajectory is essential for the development and targeting of programmes and policies to support family caregivers and reduce burden. Supporting caregivers can have benefits such as improved caregiver health outcomes, and enhancing their ability to meet care-giving demands, thereby potentially allowing for longer patient care in the home setting.

Factors related to caregiver strain in ALS: a longitudinal study

“…The positive association we found between caregiver burden and the patient's physical limitations is in agreement with previous ALS studies,2 9 16 as well as with studies in other progressive neurological disorders 30. Some studies could not, however, corroborate the impact of physical limitations on caregiver strain 15 17 19.…”

Utilisation of home-based physician, nurse and personal support worker services within a palliative care programme in Ontario, Canada: trends over 2005-2015

“…Three data sets were collected through prospective, longitudinal cohort studies in collaboration with the Temmy Latner Center for Palliative Care (TLCPC) at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, Canada (Guerriere et al . ). The data sets represent three separate time periods: July 2005 to September 2007; July 2010 to August 2012; and January 2014 to July 2015 (Guerriere et al .…”

“…The data sets represent three separate time periods: July 2005 to September 2007; July 2010 to August 2012; and January 2014 to July 2015 (Guerriere et al . b, ).…”

“…, Guerriere et al . ). However, there is still a paucity of research focusing on the use of services provided by multidisciplinary palliative care teams.…”

Moving from place to place in the last year of life: A qualitative study identifying care setting transition issues and solutions in O ntario

“…These moves typically occur because end‐of‐life (EOL) care needs emerge and change over time (Doyle‐Brown, ; Murray, Kendall, Boyd, & Sheikh, ; Thurston, Wilson, & Hewitt, ; Wilson, ). Another common reason is family caregiver exhaustion and burnout (Bainbridge, Seow, Sussman, Pond, & Barbera, ; Guerriere et al., ; Seow et al., , ). Although one would expect that these moves would be beneficial for the care recipient and their family, they are increasingly being viewed as problematic.…”