Predictors of Athlete’s Performance in Ultra-Endurance Mountain Races

Abstract

Background: In previous studies, ultra-endurance performance has been associated with training and psychological variables. However, performance under extreme conditions is understudied, mainly due to difficulties in making field measures. Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the role of training, hydration, nutrition, oral health status, and stress-related psychological factors in athletes’ performance in ultra-endurance mountain events. Methods: We analyzed the variables of race time and training, hydration state, nutrition, oral health status, and stress-related psychological factors in 448 ultra-endurance mountain race finishers divided into three groups according to race length (less than 45 km, 45–90 km, and greater than 90 km), using a questionnaire. Results: Higher performance in ultra-endurance mountain races was associated with better oral health status and higher accumulative altitude covered per week as well as higher positive accumulative change of altitude per week during training. In longer distance races, experience, a larger volume of training, and better hydration/nutrition prior to the competition were associated with better performance. Conclusions: Ultra-endurance mountain athletes competing in longer races (>90 km) have more experience and follow harder training schedules compared with athletes competing in shorter distances. In longer races, a larger fluid intake before the competition was the single best predictor of performance. For races between 45 and 90 km, training intensity and volume were key predictors of performance, and for races below 45 km, oral health status was a key predictor of performance. Psychological factors previously reported as ultra-endurance mountain race performance predictors were inconsistent or failed to predict the performance of athletes in the present research.

The Relative Importance of Training and Social Support for Runners’ Performance: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…The first result was the importance of weekly training volume for running performance. Training variables were previously related to runner's performance in both elite and amateur subgroups [22][23][24][25]. Training is linked to a plethora of physiological changes such as the improvement of the central aerobic components, use of oxygen by the muscle, and increase in anaerobic threshold [26], through the increases in the mitochondrial content and skeletal muscle capillary density [27].…”

Are Crohn’s Disease Patients Limited in Sport Practise? An UltraEndurance Case–Control Study Response

“…A large sample was precluded due to the difficulty in finding patients willing to participate in ultra-endurance events. An analysis of stress hormones such as cortisol or alpha amylase would help in understanding the psychophysiological stress response of participants, but economical issues limited the analysis of these hormones [ 59 , 60 , 61 ].…”

Biophysical characterization of the first ultra-cyclist in the world to break the 1,000 km barrier in 24-h non-stop road cycling: A case report

“…An improvement in experience might have helped to improve athletic performance. Recent studies showed that training intensity and competition was important ( 18 , 49 , 50 ). For ultra-marathoners, it has been shown that ultra-endurance mountain athletes competing in longer races have more experience and train harder than athletes competing in shorter distances ( 50 ).…”

“…Recent studies showed that training intensity and competition was important ( 18 , 49 , 50 ). For ultra-marathoners, it has been shown that ultra-endurance mountain athletes competing in longer races have more experience and train harder than athletes competing in shorter distances ( 50 ). Successful finishers in the “TransEurope FootRace” 2009 showed that the extent of pre-race training in the last year before the race and personal best times for marathon and specific ultra-marathons have a high correlation to race performance ( 49 ).…”