2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2016.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of ageing-related decline across multiple cognitive functions

Abstract: It is critical to discover why some people's cognitive abilities age better than others'. We applied multivariate growth curve models to data from a narrow-age cohort measured on a multi-domain IQ measure at age 11 years and a comprehensive battery of thirteen measures of visuospatial, memory, crystallized, and processing speed abilities at ages 70, 73, and 76 years (n = 1091 at age 70). We found that 48% of the variance in change in performance on the thirteen cognitive measures was shared across all measures… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

23
175
5
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(62 reference statements)
23
175
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This extends our previous work on the general factor of cognitive change (Ritchie et al, 2016). If there is a 'common cause' at work in physical functions, we should expect to see correlated within-individual decline in the three measures.…”
Section: Ageing Of Cognitive and Physical Functionssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This extends our previous work on the general factor of cognitive change (Ritchie et al, 2016). If there is a 'common cause' at work in physical functions, we should expect to see correlated within-individual decline in the three measures.…”
Section: Ageing Of Cognitive and Physical Functionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A further 26% of variance was explained at the domain level, 2 S. J. Ritchie et al and 26% was explained at the level of the individual tests (Ritchie et al, 2016). These proportions correspond closely to those from an analysis of changes in abstract reasoning, spatial visualization, episodic memory, and processing speed, in an independent longitudinal study of an age-heterogenous sample of adults by Tucker-Drob (2011a): 39% of the variance in change was domaingeneral, 33% was domain-specific, and 28% was testspecific.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We also tested crystallised ability, which remains relatively stable in later life [25]. All four domains also contribute to overall cognitive ability [26]. These relationships among cognitive tests and domains are described in the Statistical Analyses section below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a trajectory of change) variables. We modelled cognitive function using a hierarchical ‘factor of curves’ model, previously established with these data [26]. For each cognitive test we modelled a level (essentially the age 70 baseline) and a linear slope (the change between age 70 and 79, taking all four measurement occasions into account); for each cognitive domain (see Cognitive function, above) a latent level and linear slope variable were correspondingly composed of the individual tests’ latent level and latent slope variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may partly explain the relatively modest correlation of VNR with TMT performance, when compared to those previously reported 9 and may have also had a bearing on our analyses of genetic overlap within UK Biobank. In addition, the UK Biobank sample did not have sufficient breadth of contemporaneously-administered standardized/validated cognitive tests to be able to construct a robust measure of general cognitive function (such as in other large samples 9,20,68 ). This limited our ability to perform a more detailed analysis of the phenotypic or genetic overlap between trail making and general cognitive function in UK Biobank itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%