2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of a histopathologic diagnosis of complicated appendicitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was surprising because the majority of published studies did not find an association between patients' sex and the rate of complicated AA. [35][36][37] Additionally, we confirmed that patients with complicated AA are, overall, older. A possible explanation for this observation was previously described.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This was surprising because the majority of published studies did not find an association between patients' sex and the rate of complicated AA. [35][36][37] Additionally, we confirmed that patients with complicated AA are, overall, older. A possible explanation for this observation was previously described.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Ishiyama et al found an association of appendicoliths that were large and present at the base of the appendix with appendiceal perforation and gangrene [11]. Imran et al described the increased odds of perforated appendicitis with greater symptom duration and the presence of an appendicolith [20]. The odds of complicated appendicitis in this study were increased by 2.4 times for those who had appendicoliths.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Appendicoliths, a non-modifiable risk factor, is estimated to be present in up to 30% of asymptomatic population [19]. Both of these factors have been shown to increase the risk of complicated appendicitis in other recent studies as well [11,20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only variable significantly associated with unexpected re-hospitalization was appendicolith, also known as fecalith, corpolith, or stercolith. Appendicolith, which is composed of firm feces and some mineral deposits, is a well-established risk factor for perforation [ 28 30 ], inflammation [ 31 ], and failure of antibiotics treatment [ 32 ] or post-operative adverse events [ 31 , 33 , 34 ]. In our series, BMI was not associated with unexpected re-consultations or re-hospitalizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%