1999
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors for work incapacity continuing after disc surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
38
2
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
38
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…High scores in the ODI and in leg pain assessment by VAS can be regarded as alarm signals for a poor socioeconomic outcome, i.e., more lost working days and higher costs to the society. The ODI has earlier appeared to be a predictor of permanent or prolonged disability after lumbar disc surgery [15,19,28]. The present study is the first to show that the ODI is a risk factor for loss of working time, i.e., indirect societal cost, as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…High scores in the ODI and in leg pain assessment by VAS can be regarded as alarm signals for a poor socioeconomic outcome, i.e., more lost working days and higher costs to the society. The ODI has earlier appeared to be a predictor of permanent or prolonged disability after lumbar disc surgery [15,19,28]. The present study is the first to show that the ODI is a risk factor for loss of working time, i.e., indirect societal cost, as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Most studies on productivity loss due to lost work related to lumbar disc herniation have only considered permanent exit from the labour market and reported that 60-85% of patients return to work within 1-3 years after lumbar disc surgery [15,40,49]. With longer follow-up times (7-10 years) 77-93% of patients have regained employment [22,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This corroborates with the evidence review for UK occupational health guidelines by Waddell and Burton. They found that the worker's own beliefs that their LBP was caused by their work and their own expectations about inability to RTW are particularly important [4,11,17,19,27]. A systematic review by Mondloch et al summarized the mechanisms by which expectations can affect outcomes [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the MSPQ was introduced in the literature in 1983, the instrument has been used extensively in clinical and research settings. The MSPQ has mainly been employed on individuals suffering from various pain conditions (Adams, Mannion, & Dolan, 1999;Donceel & Du Bois, 1999;Gockel et al, 1995;Greenough, 1993;Koho, Aho, Watson, & Hurri, 2001;Main, 1983;Norrefalk, Svensson, Ekholm, & Borg, 2005;Penta & Fraser, 1997;Trief, Grant, & Fredrickson, 2000;Wand et al, 2004). The instrument has however also been used on tinnitus patients (Newman, Wharton, & Jacobson, 1997;Robinson et al, 2003), on patients with Meniere's disease (Storper, Spitzer, & Scanlan, 1998), on bereaved couples (Lang, Gottlieb, & Amsel, 1996), on individuals with insomnia (Jansson & Linton, 2007), on women with chest pain (Warner, 1995) and on patients with myocardial infarction (Frasure-Smith & Lespe´rance, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%