2021
DOI: 10.1080/21693277.2021.1976963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors for distributed ledger technology adoption: integrating three traditional adoption theories for manufacturing and service operations

Abstract: It is expected that blockchain technology will bring a disruptive paradigm shift in the manner in which transactions are conducted in the manufacturing and service enterprises. By eliminating the drawbacks of trust-related issues in a business chain, the distributed database of blockchain can bring transparency with pseudonymity and irreversibility of records. In this paper, we advance the limited literature on DLT and its adoption in the manufacturing and service enterprises. The proposed model is based on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(169 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The determination of students and educators is an important factor in accepting or refusing M-learning [6,7]. While the delivery of learning facilities is now predictable for M-learning, many of the universities' initiatives have been a key step in M-learning [8][9][10]. However, technical and non-technical hurdles remain, especially for students' utilization and adoption of M-learning [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of students and educators is an important factor in accepting or refusing M-learning [6,7]. While the delivery of learning facilities is now predictable for M-learning, many of the universities' initiatives have been a key step in M-learning [8][9][10]. However, technical and non-technical hurdles remain, especially for students' utilization and adoption of M-learning [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, most of the recent literature evidenced that Attitude is the main factor towards the intention to adopt cryptocurrency usage while Subjective Norm is not the influencing factor (Ramachandran & Stella, 2022;Zamzami, 2020). In addition, other researchers report similar findings which indicated that Subjective Norm did not affect significantly on the behavioral intention towards Cryptocurrency usage as evidenced by Ullah, Al-Rahmi and Alkhalifah's (2021) study in Pakistan and Mazambani and Mutambara's (2019) study in South Africa. Contrariwise, findings by Almajali, Masa'Deh and Dahalin (2022) showed that Subjective Norm was positively affected cryptocurrency's intention to use in Jordan.…”
Section: Intention To Adopt Cryptocurrencymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly, Walton and Johnston (2018) discovered that people rather invest in Bitcoin if their social group of family, friends, and peers have a positive attitude towards cryptocurrency and invest in it, which was confirmed by several studies (Boxer & Thompson, 2020;Gazali et al, 2019;Jankeeparsad & Tewari, 2018;Kim, 2021;Schaupp & Festa, 2018). Still, Zamzami (2020) has not found subjective norm as an influencing factor in Indonesia, nor Mazambani and Mutambara (2019) in South Africa, Ullah et al (2021) found its negligible impact in Pakistan, and Arias-Oliva et al ( 2021) discovered it as an enabling factor with a positive influence on intention to use cryptocurrency in Spain.…”
Section: Introduction To Cryptocurrencymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Some studies also found a significant positive impact of perceived usefulness and ease of use (Albayati et al, 2020;Arias-Oliva et al, 2019;Nadeem et al, 2021;Nuryyev et al, 2018), and other authors only found their indirect effect (Shahzad et al, 2018;Walton & Johnston, 2018), or that it fluctuates within various consumer categories (Janssen et al, 2015). Similarly, while several studies found personal innovativeness as a good predictor of intention to use cryptocurrency (Abbasi et al, 2021;Sohaib et al, 2019;Sun et al, 2020), others found it had a negligible impact (Ullah et al, 2021). Previous studies have also found the impact of perceived benefits (Gazali et al, 2019;Yoo et al, 2020), performance expectancy (Arias-Oliva et al, 2019), effort expectancy and facilitating condition (Jankeeparsad & Tewari, 2018;Ter Ji-Xi et al, 2021), perceived enjoyment (Nadeem et al, 2021), and other factors.…”
Section: Introduction To Cryptocurrencymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation