2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors for complete pathological response for stage II and III rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the median size (5 cm) was used as cut-off, an association with CR was seen only among patients receiving scRT+CT. The results confirm the clinical impression that even tumors larger than 5 cm can respond completely, with increasing proportions CR with more intensive treatment, but that smaller tumors reach CR more often [39]. In the study by Garland et al including 294 patients, size was predictive (p = 0.008), but no cut-off was defined [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…When the median size (5 cm) was used as cut-off, an association with CR was seen only among patients receiving scRT+CT. The results confirm the clinical impression that even tumors larger than 5 cm can respond completely, with increasing proportions CR with more intensive treatment, but that smaller tumors reach CR more often [39]. In the study by Garland et al including 294 patients, size was predictive (p = 0.008), but no cut-off was defined [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…None of the other factors we investigated showed a similar correlation with pCR. Tumor size, 25 clinical T and N stage, 26 tumor grade, 27 circumferential involvement, and tumor shape 28 were all equivocal in patients who achieved pCR and those who did not, despite previous descriptions in the literature regarding their possible predictive role for pCR. However, it is plausible that a small sample size did not allow enough power to detect significant associations between these factors and pCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Diverse clinical, radiological, pathological, and molecular factors have been associated to LARC treatment efficacy. Whereas all these contribute to the understanding of the biology of therapeutic response, we still have no markers reaching the precision required for clinical applications, when responsive patients identified prior to cancer treatment would benefit from the adoption of non-operative therapies (“watch and wait”) ( 3 , 47 ) and refractory subjects could be spared from the conventional nCRT treatment. Despite the continuous search for histological, serological, cellular, and molecular markers, there are no established predictive factors to the response to nCRT in rectal cancer ( 48 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%