2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors for Clinical Outcomes After Accelerated Partial Breast Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of relationship between PTV and pain contrasts our prior report [37]. However, the current analysis corroborates the statistically significant relationship between the volume of the chest wall receiving >35 Gy and patient-reported pain as previously discussed (results not shown).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of relationship between PTV and pain contrasts our prior report [37]. However, the current analysis corroborates the statistically significant relationship between the volume of the chest wall receiving >35 Gy and patient-reported pain as previously discussed (results not shown).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This report is an update to previous publications [3437] and represents the largest cohort and longest follow-up of APBIMRT reported to date. Four-year results continue to demonstrate excellent local control, survival, cosmetic results, and toxicity profile and support the continued use and study of this technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…29,36,37 However, other clinical series of APBI delivered with 3D-CRT or IMRT reported acceptable cosmetic outcomes. 9,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] These conflicting studies raise the hypothesis that subtle variations in planning techniques and/or dose constraints may substantially modify the therapeutic ratio of EBRT-based APBI. [46][47][48] In light of ongoing research, particularly the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-39/RTOG 0413 trial, 5 which has yet to report cosmetic outcomes for patients treated with 3D-CRT APBI, the task force opted not to make a specific recommendation either for or against the use of EBRT-based APBI at this time.…”
Section: Comment On External Beam Apbimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EB-APBI is non-invasive and offers the advantages of decreased procedural trauma to the breast and relative ease of adoption for most radiation treatment facilities, thus potentially expanding the accessibility of APBI to more patients with prior augmentation mammoplasty. The precision required to optimize dose homogeneity and customize implant-sparing is particularly amenable to manipulation with IMRT (2325, 31). This updated and expanded data series corroborates and strengthens our previous report that breast-conserving therapy including APBI in general, and EB-APBI in particular, is a viable treatment option for patients with prior breast augmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%